MyFox
 

dprin339's Blog

by dprin339 from Wherever I am

Last Post 1 hour Ago


Rice: Iran Not Serious at Nuke Meeting, Could Face New Sanctions

Sunday, July 20, 2008

SHANNON, Ireland —  Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice accused Iran on Monday of not being serious at weekend talks about its disputed nuclear program despite the presence of a senior U.S. diplomat, and warned it may soon face new sanctions.

In her first public comments since Saturday's meeting in Switzerland, Rice said Iran had given the run-around to envoys from the U.S. and five other world powers. She said all six nations were serious about a two-week deadline Iran now has to agree to freeze suspect activities and start negotiations or be hit with new penalties.

At the meeting, Iran had been expected to respond to a package of incentives offered in exchange for halting enrichment of uranium, which can be used to fuel atomic weapons. The Bush administration broke with long-standing policy to send a top diplomat to support the offer.

However, Rice said that instead of a coherent answer, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili delivered a "meandering" monologue full of irrelevant "small talk about culture" that appeared to annoy many of the others present at the table in Geneva.

"We expected to hear an answer from the Iranians but, as has been the case so many times with the Iranians, what came through was not serious," Rice told reporters aboard her plane as she flew to the United Arab Emirates. "It's time for the Iranians to give a serious answer."

"They can't go and stall and make small talk about culture, they have to make a decision," she said. "People are tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics."

Rice's remarks about the Iranian presentation were much harsher than those of the host of the meeting, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who lamented only that Iran had not provided "all the answers to the questions."

On Sunday, Iranian state radio reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad called the talks a "step ahead" and said country's formal assessment would be issued soon.

On Saturday, one member of the Iranian delegation said there was "no chance" Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, again denying assertions that Iran's nuclear program was for anything other than power production. Jalili avoided the suspension issue entirely.

Unless Iran responds positively in the next two weeks, it can expect more sanctions to be imposed by the United States and the European Union as early as late August or September and may then be hit with a fourth sanctions resolution at the U.N. Security Council, Rice said.

"We will see what Iran does in two weeks, but I think the diplomatic process now has a new kind of energy to it," she said. "If they do not decide to suspend then we will be in a situation where we have to return to the Security Council."

Rice was briefed on the meeting by the State Department's No. 3 diplomat, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs William Burns, who attended the session in a shift from Washington's previous insistence that it would not meet with the Iranians unless the enrichment had stopped.

High-level contact between the United States and Iran is extremely rare and Burns' presence at the talks may have confused the Iranians, Rice said, acknowledging a tactical change to demonstrate U.S. unity with the other five powers: Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

"From time to time, it is important to invigorate the diplomacy," she said. "I think that the fact that we went may have been a bit surprising to the Iranians, and they didn't react in a way that gave anyone any confidence."

The offer envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment, during which time no additional sanctions would be imposed. That is intended to create the framework for formal negotiations that, it is hoped, will lead to a permanent halt of enrichment.

Rice was dismissive when asked if Burns or another U.S. diplomat would be present to hear Iran's response in two weeks.

"I think we've done enough to demonstrate that the United States is serious and to assure our partners that we're serious," she said.



Hmmmm now, Bush, Rice, Cheny, McCain, etc all KNEW this was a waste of time & energy.....................how is it Obama didn't know?  Wait! EXPERIENCE!  Aha! That's the difference!

 

30 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 30
Page 1 of 2
1
Last
sofakingdabest read my blog view my photos
Jul 21, 2008 | 9:55 AM

It's like watching a movie and you know what's gonna happen in each scene. Hey, shouldn't Russia be sanctioned? They sold Iran the nukes.

polarbear_88 read my blog view my photos
Jul 21, 2008 | 2:16 PM

How's life on the Double Talk Express, D?

That's all it is: DOUBLE TALK. When Obama wants to go to the Middle East and talk, he's branded a coward, a whimp and inexperienced.

But what happens now, BUSH sends someone to these negotiations!! Flip flop, blah blah!!

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 21, 2008 | 7:24 PM

"Rice was dismissive when asked if Burns or another U.S. diplomat would be present to hear Iran's response in two weeks."

Do you not know middle-eastern culture ? Women are not considered as equals with men, so you know what weight a woman negotiating with middle-eastern men would carry. It would be beneath them. Negotiations with a man would be much more fruitful.

"Hmmmm now, Bush, Rice, Cheny, McCain, etc all KNEW this was a waste of time & energy.....................how is it Obama didn't know? Wait! EXPERIENCE! Aha! That's the difference"

Yeaaah ! Just bomb the hell out of `em ! Why bother to negotiate ! They`ll see things our` way !

manojiitan12
Jul 22, 2008 | 3:36 AM

Iran Not Serious at Nuke Meeting, Could Face New Sanctions In her first public comments since Saturday's meeting in Switzerland, Rice said Iran had given the run-around to envoys from the U.S. and five other world powers. She said all six nations were serious about a two-week deadline Iran now has to agree to freeze suspect activities and start negotiations or be hit with new penalties.


mack

Addiction Recovery Pennsylvania

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 22, 2008 | 11:45 AM

again PB you missed the point. the whole trip was a waste of time & energy. MOST people already KNEW that, except for Obama.............and this proves that having tea with this nut is a waste.

casey, that could be part of the problem, but tough [...]...........SHE is our representative.....WE should not be expected to bow to THEIR ridiculous ways in this. THEY are the offenders...........

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 22, 2008 | 6:59 PM

But does this mean we should go out of our` way to offend the offenders ? Certain people are more likely to get the job done.

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 23, 2008 | 6:20 AM

ahhhh casey, i smell some male chauvenism (spell? ricky help me out here) here.........

i doesn't matter what THEY want or feel anyway. once again, Iran has made it CRYSTAL CLEAR that it doesn't matter WHO talks to them about ANYTHING, they aren't backing down...........thus, we are ALL going to war..............just watch......

and iraq WILL end up being the "staging ground" for the war with Iran..........

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 23, 2008 | 10:56 AM

Have you read the morning report about Iran praising the U.S. for taking part in the negotiations ? They called it " A step in the right direction."

Male chauvinism ? NO. Rationale ? YES !

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 23, 2008 | 11:21 AM

didn't see that one casey.......where?

all i read this morning was them refusing to back down and co-operate did you see that?

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 23, 2008 | 11:41 AM

casey, once again, you failed to bother to post ALL of the information, only what you think suits your agenda. here is some quotes from this nutjob, your new BFF.

Ahmadinejad described U.S. participation in the latest round of nuclear talks a "positive step forward" toward recognizing Iran's right to acquire nuclear technology. (ummmmm NO, Iran has NO right to acquire nukes......the whole world keeps telling him that)

"You (U.S.) took a positive step. It was a step toward recognizing the rights of the Iranian nation, toward justice, toward repairing your image in the world, toward cleaning 50 years of crimes you committed against the Iranian nation," (wow casey, he sounds like he's reading from YOUR playbook........)

But Ahmadinejad urged the United States to continue its "positive" attendance in the talks. (sure, as long as the subject is controlled by aminijihad)

"I advise you not to ruin the positive step you took through irrelevant words and claims." (irrelevant? the proliferation of nuclear weapons if irrelevant? )

"The Iranian nation will not retreat one iota in the face of oppressing powers," he said. "The Iranian nation has chosen its path." (there it is casey, the meeting WAS a waste of time)

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 23, 2008 | 1:45 PM

You are then saying negotiation will not work. I agree that Iran should NOT possess nuclear weaponry. But if they can PROVE beyond the shadow of a doubt that their` nuclear technology is for peaceful purposes, would you deny them this ?

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 6:50 AM

no, i wouldn't. but, all the shenanigans they have been pulling only makes them more suspect, not less. if that's all it was and all it will ever be, then why all the saber rattling? the whole world knows that aminijihad talks out of both sides of his mouth!

there is something ELSE there........if there wasn't, there wouldn't be all this baloney with him.............

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 6:54 AM

on another point there PB, your messiah's little visit to Iraq was ALSO a waste of time & a waste of OUR money.

he's STILL stuck on HIS idea of HIS war & making it clear that he will IGNORE what the experienced experts & the iraqi government KNOW about how & when to drawdown...........and go tromping into Afganistan (where bin laden & co are NOT) and then ILLEGALLY cross into Pakistan after them.

He has made it clear that HIS plan and ONLY his plan is the one that will be carried out IF he's elected. The Generals, Military Experts, Iraqi Politicians, Iraqi Security & the "boots on the ground" over there are to be dismissed & overruled for HIS war! He wants to desert the Iraqi's in pursuit of HIS WAR.

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 7:15 AM

"why all the saber rattling? the whole world knows that aminijihad talks out of both sides of his mouth!" - dprin

I`m sorry princess but I couldn`t help but laugh at this one. Dubya is always saber rattling and the whole world knows that the way to tell when he`s lying is when he opens his` mouth......LMAO !

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 7:19 AM

Aaaaah, HIS WAR ! That`s the war Dubya HAD to have.

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 7:50 AM

okay, maybe so. Iraq is Bush's war, & we have succeeded.

saber rattling? i thought you were complaining a couple of weeks ago because we were ignoring them? we were ignoring them & rattling the saber both? how can THAT be?

and Afganistan & Pakistan will be Obama's war....

the two aren't so different now are they?

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 8:32 AM

"okay, maybe so. Iraq is Bush's war, & we have succeeded."
MISSION ACCOMPLISHED ? I`ve seen that movie !

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 11:46 AM

ah i get it casey, no matter how quiet it is over there, no matter how much progress goes on, no matter when or how they vote their leaders in, no matter how many women finally get an education..........it will ALWAYS ALWAYS be a horrible failure right?

how sad that you can't seem to get out of this hate bush rut........

psssst! open your eyes casey, we are not done by any means........but we & the iraqi people are well on the way to THEIR freedom!

dprin339 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 11:49 AM

hey btw, if obama gets himself elected, and then he sends our troops out of iraq and into afganistan & pakistan to fight al quada........are you going to call HIM a chickenhawk too?

he never bothered to serve in the military & he will be sending our troops into battle.....that's what a chickenhawk is isn't it? someone who won't fight but will send the soldiers to fight?

so, obama is a chickenhawk........just like bush. and mccain isn't LMAO

caseyjones38 read my blog view my photos
Jul 24, 2008 | 4:22 PM

"psssst! open your eyes casey, we are not done by any means"
Keep in mind Princess that THEY are not done by any means either.

"he never bothered to serve in the military & he will be sending our troops into battle.....that's what a chickenhawk is isn't it? someone who won't fight but will send the soldiers to fight?"

In this definition you forgot the part that says, "To Hell with negotiation. We`ll just bomb them into submission !"

Page 1 of 2
1
Last


Write your comment below:




dprin339

Princess Warrior.......without my helmet ANNOY A LIBERAL: WORK HARD AND BE HAPPY!

Member Since: 6/28/2007