Whatever you want to call it.

What would we do without Barack Obama? This seems to be the common theme of the greater Democratic voting concensus - a group that holds enduring enthusiasm for a presidential candidate that really has no leadership experience or compelling credentials to lead anybody to believe that he could be a worthwhile president of the United States. While there seems to be no doubt that the motto of "change" is something that the United States desperately needs, unfortunately there is no corresponding evidence that Barrry Obama can pull off any level of substantial "change" that will ultimately be viewed as beneficial to this nation. Obviously we have all read Barry's "Blueprint for Change" that has been glossed over time and time again - you can read Barry's "Blueprint" on his website and I would hurry to print a copy because this literature is being hailed as being Biblical in proportions in Democratic circles and probably will not be free to the public for long - but Barry's entire political philosophy will not be free either. I keep hearing Obamamaniacs harping on how they can't wait for Barry to win the election so that gas prices will drop - funny that Obama voters say this because Barry's blueprint does not adequately address the issue of rising energy or fuel prices. Conversely, Obama's energy plans are likely to increase energy pricing across the board as Barry institutes cap and trade measures and tax increases on non-renewable energy sources - read the text for yourself - I know that you all have your printed copy handy (I do).

Recently, I found it interesting that the only viable presidential candidate that has vowed to ignore the budget deficit crisis is none other than Barack Obama. John McCain and Bob Barr have both committed themselves to either shrinking the budget deficit or seeking a balanced budget amendment. Obama has made it clear that he intends on spending tax money, instituting new spending policies, and taxing the hell out of anyone who makes over $250,000 per year. While it may seem fair to go after those hideous people making in excess of $250K, remember that most of you work for these very people - the people that you depend on for your yearly wage increases. Another hot topic among Obamamaniacs is the issue of the war in Iraq and Obama's pledge to end the Iraq war - eventually..... It seems rather interesting that Obama once pledged to end the war rapidly, and then he actually learned what we were doing there and the events that were occuring in Iraq, and the new pledge turned into a "withdrawal dependent upon the situation" scenario. Hmmm........ I'm sure that most everyone (whom is not voting for Obama at least) noticed Barry's little speech of "my first day in office I will meet with the Joint Chiefs of Staff and give them a new mission - end the war...yada, yada, yada" - this sounds great, but the only problem with this is that the Joint Chiefs of Staff do not command ground forces in active military engagements, and they have not had a role in active duty strategic command since the early 1980's. Obama would actually give an "end the war" command to his Secretary of Defense and this command would be sent directly to ground force commanders such as General Patreaus. Perhaps it is just me, but I would have thought that Obama would hold at least a small amount of knowledge about the role of Commander in Chief if this is the "job" that he is seeking....

One thing that I will give to Barry is that he must certainly have the biggest set of heuvos of any presedential candidate in history. While President Bush has been characteristically brash and bold in putting Congressional Democrats in their place and also single handidly facing an international terrorism crisis, Obama probably has Bush beaten in any concept of bravery. Obama has spoken loudly of his intentions to spend more tax payer money than any other president in history - and this is no easy task. Many may remember that Franklin D. Roosevelt injected drastic amounts of money into New Deal programs and had quite a few of these programs struck down as unconstitutional by the Supreme Court; Roosevelt's New Deal may have been essential to saving Americans during the Great Depression, yet Barry Obama is speaking of government expansions that make Roosevelt's errors in constitutionality look relatively benign and all for the sake of increasing his voting base in a fraudulent voter buying scheme.

Few other Democratic presidents could ever claim to have the apparent heuvos that Barry has. The only peanuts that Jimmy Carter ever laid claim to were being grown on the family farm, and we all know that Monica had control (figuratively and literally) of Slick Willy's party bag, but it seems apparent that Barry is officially "the man" - you would think that this guy would have fifteen kids at the very least...

The most enlightening aspect of Obama's campaign is the God-like zen that Obama has created among the masses of Democratic voters - you know, the people that claim "we don't worship him" and then mumble "change we can believe in" while sleeping. Have you noticed that even referring to Barry as "Bomer" or "Bomber" is considered blasphemy among Democratic circles - the people who claim to never worship Obama and then make threats to those whom insult their presidential messiah? Interestingly, many of these same Democrats found great delight in referring to President Bush as "dubya" and "the village idiot" and then find themselves unable to cope with anybody who refuses to jump on board of the Obama idol worship bandwagon. The Obamamaniacs consider anyone resisting Obama's mark of the beast to be members of the conservative "warmonger" breed of American voters. I've always found it interesting that hardened Democrats refer to Republicans as "warmongers" when such notable events as WWI, WWII, Korea, and Vietnam were products of Democratic presidents. President Clinton's presidency was littered with war actions - including a demoralizing defeat in Somalia. Now who are the warmongers? A Republican got us out of Vietnam. A Republican ended the cold war without one shot being fired. A Republican throttled Saddam Hussein's Iraqi military in a matter of hours in the early 90's. Why do Democrats even try to make an argument?

Regardless of any substance, lessons of history, lessons learned, or careful reservation, the Obama voters are making a stand to get their juvenile candidate into the White House. The prospect of free health care paid for by people who actually work just seems so important. I noticed that Obamamaniacs are insisting that Americans have a "Right" to healthcare - another indication that these people have never read the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution, but good for a laugh at the very least. Obama supporters believe that the economy can be "saved" if Obama injects billions of dollars of taxpayer money into federal entitlement programs. The Obama supporters never watched European economies collapse as federal spending consumed the national GDP of Eastern European nations. Obama supporters never knew that Obama's plan for "change" is merely comprised of repressive social programs and heightened regulatory practices which target free markets - ploys that have destroyed nations around the world (interesting that the U.S. gives monetary aid to many of these same nations to this day). Either way, the Obamamaniacs won't care about their own obvious ignorance and carelessness. Change is on the menu for America - hopefully the voters will decide to go on a diet.

Over the years, left wingers and SOCIALIST LIBERALS have redefined the meaning of Patriotism. This event happened sometime after perverting the meaning of "liberal" and creating a political philosophy of collectivism and installing a group think mentality that scorns the beliefs of individualism for the sake of "the greater good" - a common theme that you will hear at nearly every Democratic political campaign stop, and a thesis of every Democrat politician that is also utilized to justify tax increases. You hear it all the time: "we must act now to stop these Bush tax breaks for 'the greater good' of society" - and this is such a common theme that there is no need to even cite sources of origination because all Democrats tend to openly reveal their "common good" aspirations. This is the new age of liberalism at it's best, but understand that this is actually defined as "social liberalism" and has nothing to do with "classical liberalism" in philosophical works that you would have noted from the works of those such as Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and Governor Morris. The social liberals stole the word liberal to attempt to create a "one size fits all" definition of American liberalism and combined the belief with a warped interpretation of Constitutionality, and now these liberals are attempting to steal the word patriotism in order to pervert this word as well! Perhaps it was no surprise when Barry Obama issued his own theory of patriotism lately, and the predictable response we got was another "for the greater good" speeches that stressed "faith in each other as Americans" over any recognizable need to offer devotion to your country. As expected, Barry's "faith in each other" argument is yet another example of social collectivism and has been classically orchestrated to strike at individualism (i.e. individual liberty, individual freedom) for the sake of group rights, group liberty, group security, group taxation of the most productive members of society, group think, and so on and so forth. Individuality seems to be the biggest threat to social liberalism (Lenin hated the concept of individuality too) and what could be more of a threat to the group-minded mentalities of liberals than an individual devotion to the country that you live in (damn those crazy right-winger NEOCONS!!!). With that being said, a devoted Democrat blogger gave a very clear indication of whom IS NOT patriotic, and his list clearly pointed to examples of what is and what is not patriotic. Clearly, according to this social liberal, you ARE NOT patriotic if you:

- Wear a lapel pin

- Hold devotion to the flag of the United States of America

- Support any political policy of an elected official that you voted for (especially a policy of national security)

- Support the security and sovereignty of the nation you live in

- Believe that the U.S. is the greatest nation on Earth

- If you are stupid enough to remember 9/11/01 (and if you learned a lesson from it!)

- If you support the troops fighting for this nation

- If you fight for this nation

- If you are white

By contrast and using the collectivist mantras of new age liberal Democrats, the liberal blogger indicated the obvious that YOU ARE patriotic if you.......

- if you refuse to openly express devotion to your nation

- if you hate the American flag

- if you openly demonstrate your unwillingness to defend your country against enemies

- if you are so afraid of defending your country that you resort to pacifying enemies to buy a little bit of time until your term is finished

- if you believe that we are inferior and weaker than every other nation on Earth. Big time points if you believe that the U.S. is the root of all problems in the world!

- if you believe that those lovable Muslim extremists are finished going after American interests

- if you hold a protest at the grave of a fallen soldier

- if you consider weakness to be a virtue

- if you illegally enter this nation or if you openly sponge off of taxpayer funded entitlement programs

- if you cried after Saddam Hussein was hung and then took it out on your unborn child by having an abortion

Yeah, yeah, the mods will probably delete my blog but it's been fun anyway.....

Sometimes enough is enough, and you just feel an unavoidable compulsion to pipe in. As some of you longtime bloggers may know, my blogs usually have nothing good to say about the Democratic party, yet this blog is uniquely different. I plan on saying exactly eleven nice things about Barack Obama (no significance in the number), simply because he deserves praise for where he has gotten to this point, but don't fool yourself into thinking that I'm going to be too awfully nice.

Before delving into how great Obama is, let's cut to the chase here - Obama's popularity is the result of his own exuberance and is entirely the product of his own magnanomous star quality. If there is any element of truth that Democrats actually oppose the idea of organized evangelical religion, then it would obvously be an insult to most Democrats to compare Obama to the almighty God. Perhaps we should refer to Obama as the all-powerful Zues - at least this analogy fits accordingly with the mythical fantasy world that Democrats have lived in since the 1960's in a land that began as The Great Society and eventually turned into a 1990's kingdom known as "the common good." We can merely wonder where the Candy Land path of Obama's campaign platform will lead this nation, and more specifically what it will be called - it won't be America anymore. I have to admit that I find it disheartening to hear and see all the negativity surrounding Obama's past in issues ranging from Islamic roots, to the racist congregation, to the issue of political inexperience, and so on. The majority of the negativity that surrounds Obama is purely useless rhetoric and merely underscores the true issues that should be keyed in on, such as Obama's dangerous campaign platform and the deceptive practices that Obama has employed in issues such as campaign finance. It seems that the propoganda that surrounds Obama has led his followers to insist that everyone should "like" Obama or else. I have seen this in many blogsites, and the reverberating tone is that if you do not "like" Obama then be forewarned that you are some sort of deranged Nazi skinhead with an agenda against African-Americans. With this in mind, let me speak very loud and clear in saying that "I like Obama!" By God, I really like the guy! He seems to be genuinely concerned about others, he seems to be a good family man that provides well for his family, and he seems to be a good father. Well super(!), but I still fail to see why Obama would be a good president just because I "like" him. The Democrat insistance that everyone "like" Obama seems to indicate that this presidential campaign is nothing more than a ridiculous popularity contest and really has nothing to due with the direction of this nation. If "change" is the mantra of the Obama Democrats, then obviously this "change" is solely the product of creating a presidency for the sake of "like" versus the needs of the nation.

To the bloggers whom insist on spreading the fictitious stories about Obama (stories that are actually an embarrassment to even read) your stories are asinine but definitely keep 'em coming if you choose to! For seven years the Democrats spread more unproven hype about President Bush that has been repeatedly and continuously debunked. From issues of "blood for oil," to stories that President Bush (with help from Cheney of course) personally placed explosives every three floors on both Twin Towers and then Bush personally pushed the plunger to detonate the explosives located within Tower 7 - reportedly Bush did this from his home planet deep within the galaxy Andromeda while Dick Cheney and Osama bin Laden hid together in an underground bunker south of Cleveland, Ohio while they watched reruns of Happy Days. In 2005, it is reported that Bush ordered NASA scientists to create Hurricane Katrina - reportedly the infantile Katrina was made in a secret government factory that only George Bush and the former attorney general Alberto Gonzalez know about - of course Democrats somehow know all about these supposedly secret factories. I personally liked the fact of knowing that with the advent of the Patriot Act that George Bush personally listens in on every one of my phone calls that I make - no wonder Pizza Hut always messes up my delivery order, I would imagine that Bush is the one putting those anchovies on my pizza even though I repeatedly demand "no anchovies!" With George listening in on all your calls, consider yourself warned, if you call a "1-900" phone number, the heavy breathing on the other end of the line may not be the girl receiving her $2.99 per minute rate!

Clearly, George Bush holds the stigma of being one of the most hated presidents in history due to the never ending efforts of the Democrat Party - and then the Democrats have the nerve to cry and slobber when the mud is thrown back at them in fierce negativity of Barack Obama. Personally, I would have thought that enough would be enough and that the constant barrages at President Bush by the liberal Democrats would have shown the conservatives how not to act. For example, referring to the Democratic party as "socialists" is actually entirely acceptable - the Democratic agenda actually follows a close model of the written work of Marx and Engels - read it for yourself and then begrudgingly agree that the argument is par for the course. By comparison though, reciting ridiculous stories such as insisting that Barack Obama and Ayman al-Zawahiri shared a dormroom in college would be completely unacceptable - obviously we know that Obama and Zawahiri never shared a dorm because Obama attended Columbia and Harvard where he studied interpretive Constitutionality while Zawahiri graduated from Cairo University where he majored in chopping off the heads of the infidels. As you can see, Obama and Zawahiri just simply never crossed paths - it never happened.

A dramatic number of Obama supporters insist that they are voting Obama because they feel that this nation is going in the wrong direction. Despite the fact that I "like" Obama so darned much, the one trillion dollars in new welfare spending initiatives that Obama is offering in order to buy votes (with American tax dollars) just almost (and I said "almost") leaves me saying that I don't really "like" Obama all that much. If the Obama voters appreciate freedom and liberty as much as they claim to, these same voters should take the time to read Obama's plans on healthcare, retirement, minimum wage, immigration reform, and education. For a good laugh, read up on Obama's plan to control wasteful government spending and then remember that Obama never voted against one wasteful Democrat earmark spending bill. Read up on Obama's plan to end the nation's poverty crisis, and after you wipe the tears from your eyes read up on Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal (specifically the portions that the Supreme Court struck down as unconstitutional) and feel the hair on your arms stand on end. If you would like to be scared, read Obama's pledge on ending the war in Iraq and the precarious nature that Obama wants to leave the Iraqis in. In trying to make Americans feel good about themselves, Obama has stated that the useless United Nations will take control of the issue that is Iraq - whew, I feel better already considering the fantastic history of U.N. peacekeeping missions! Furthermore, Obama is making a promise which he cannot keep - Obama does not control the U.N., yet Obama has publically pledged to allow the U.N. to control our U.S. military. In order to run faster from Iraq, Obama has also stated that Iran and Syria will play a leading role in allowing the U.S. to "wash our hands of Iraq," which is an interesting concept due to the fact that the U.S. and Iraq coalition forces have spent five years working to keep the influence of terror supporting nations such as Iran and Syria out of Iraq - and now Obama has outlined a plan to literally hand Iraq to these same nations. Before running from Iraq, Obama has the great plan of asking the United Nations to supervise the rewriting of Iraq's Constitution. Have you noticed that Obama has indicated that the United Nations will lead in the Iraqi Constitutional Convention and that the Iraqi government will have to essentially "deal with it"? Even more provocatively, who in the U.N. will face the daunting task of rewriting Iraq's Constitution? To no surprise, the likely authors of Iraq's new Constititon will be members of the U.N. Human Rights Council, which coincidentally is primarily controlled by oppressive Arab nations - so much for that whole democracy idea in Iraq, it was a nice idea though and the Iraqis seemed to enjoy it for a while

Regardless of how much I really, really, really like Obama, the whole issue ends the same - Obama's platform is a train wreck waiting to happen. The liberals simply need to get past believing that this whole year is the issue of racial politics, and conservatives need to get past the fact that Obama's father was a Muslim. Obama is one of the worst choices this nation has seen for a potential president for reasons that are truthfully of Obama's own making and have nothing to do with race, Muslims, Jim Crows, Reverand Wrights, Oprah Winfreys, teenage drug binges, Indonesian jihadism, Hawaiian pineapples, or whatever else may be used as a reason to ignore the fact that Obama's candidacy consists of bad political philosophy hidden conveniently behind a great smile and a commanding voice. The Obama supporters are blinded by the popularity of Obamamania and many of those whom do not support Obama are blinded by failing to read any more than grossly biased material that makes the National Enquirer look subtle at best. For the sake of this nation, if Obama wins the Democratic nomination - he currently leads by 169 delegates - Americans need to actually educate themselves about this prematurely and irrationally developed national hero and make a more informed decision on whether they actually want this man to be president.