clevebtch's Blog

I have no problem whatsoever in helping out the poor in their time of need.  Everyone hits a bump in the road in their lives and needs help now and then.  What I do have a problem with are these people who continually leech off of the government due to laziness - not legitimate reasons.  People who decide it's much easier to sit back and collect a check and not do anything to improve their life.  Our welfare system is too lax and doesn't really help the way it SHOULD help.  Gee, let's just cut a check to these people every month because it's so much easier than to train them to do something.

What does either candidate intend to do to improve on this?  So far, I see that my taxes, as a working American, will be raised to support more and more of these people - people who don't wish to go out and work for their pay.  People who don't want to improve their lives because Uncle Sam is taking care of them just fine.

Here's a perfect example.  We work all our lives to survive, keep our heads above water, and pay into our OWN medical benefits.  Hubby gets seriously ill and our medical costs go through the roof with all of the co-pays - thousands upon thousands of dollars.  We can barely make ends meet with regular living expenses because the cost of everything has gone up so much without even a small percentage to increase the pay check.  We go seeking assistance to help pay these medical bills, but are told we work, so we don't qualify.  Where is the fairness in that?  We are not asking for someone to pay for all of our living expenses, but to give us financial help in paying off these extremely high medical bills and get kicked aside.  So, we struggle to pay down these atrocious bills, along with trying to keep a roof over our heads, food on the table, and gas in our vehicles TO GET TO OUR JOBS.

Now, you have the person next door who is perfectly healthy, young and semi-intelligent, sitting on his rear allowing welfare to take care of his lazy butt because he feels it's easier to let our system take care of him.  There's nothing wrong with him - he's fully capable of getting something, but he chooses NOT to.  Why?  Because our system makes it way too easy for him to sit back, do nothing and have money for him to drink, smoke and party every day with not a care in the world.  THIS, my dear friends, is the MAJOR problem I have with our welfare system.  Someone like this can live off of MY taxes while I struggle working 50 or more hours a week to make ends meet.  Hell, he even has a decent car, cell phone and a computer, all thanks to our wonderful system!

So far, all I see either candidate say is they want to raise my taxes for these people.  How, then, do you intend to change the system to avoid lazy slobs such as this man from "stealing" from the American worker?  There has GOT to be a better way to have a system that weeds out the unnecessary ones who, in a sense, DON'T deserve that monthly check because they choose to be lazy and a loser, but to help people who are truly in need of TEMPORARY help to get on their feet.

This is also why I'm against this Universal Healthcare stuff.  Either way, I pay for it because I am a working-class citizen.  Not only do I pay for me, but for every Tom, Dick & Harry out there who continues to sit on their rear collecting the freebies without a care in the world.  If I must pay into medical benefits, then I want to CHOOSE my medical benefits I feel is right for ME and not have the government choose for me.  I want to be able to choose my own doctors without having the worry that I may not get in to see one for months at a time.  I want to be able to have necessary medical tests without having to deal with all of the political bull that comes along to ensure that the tests truly are necessary.  I want to know that I can continue to have the best medical care out there at my choice no matter how old I get.  If I have to work and pay into it, I feel I deserve better than that lazy good-for-nothing next door to me who chooses NOT to work and, therefore, chooses NOT to get the best care out there.

All in all, I am tired of paying for everyone else while I continue to struggle through life, living paycheck to paycheck, because taxes are getting so out of hand, the cost of living continues to rise at a large rate, and my paycheck sits at the same rate with no relief in sight.  Call me selfish if you wish, but I feel that there are too many people out there fully capable of earning a real living and able to pay their own way and, frankly, I get sick of working hard so that these ingrates can continue to live comfortably off of my dime.  Naturally, if there were a person TRULY in need of help, I have no qualms about that.  I'd do whatever I could to help that person, but I'm sick of picking up the bill for lazy people.

You have Mr. Glitzy Boy, Obama, in one corner, making promises that he'll never keep (as no politician EVER does), flip-flopping around constantly, changing his views and stories as the popularity vote sees fit.  Then you have McCain, an old geezer who may not be healthy enough to survive a 4-year term, a man whose interest is only for the rich.  What kind of choices have been left to Americans for President?  Not good ones, that's for sure.

I despise Obama because of his overly-fancy, into himself attitude he portrays.  I mean, did we REALLY need all the glitz and glamour of his little "party" the other night?  Is this a sign of how well he will be with the American economy?  Let's go for the glitz and live it up, whether we have the cash or not.  Oh, wait - I forgot!  The working middle class will surely pay for his God-like demeanor to portray him to be this heavenly being that he believes himself to be.  People, his color has NOTHING to do with this - I cannot stand a person who believes they are God - the ultimate being.  He has brainwashed so many people into thinking he can make change for this country.  Really?  How?  I have yet to hear anything concerning change other than the fact that he would make history as being the first black president.  But, as many have stated, the public and especially the media, have dwelled on that issue since day 1 without really commenting about him being half-n-half.  I fully believe that he is in this for himself - and ONLY himself - and not for the right reasons.  He wants to be history - he wants to make something happen that only was once a dream.

Now we have McCain - a man who really should be retired and living in one of his multi-million dollar homes playing chess or fishing.  Is this man's heart strong enough for the stress of running a country?  Will the first crisis do him in because he won't be able to handle the stress?  And, like our current President, this man is an oil man and for big business - NOT for the working class.  I do believe he will continue on with many of Bush's ways should he get into office - ways of which I, as a U.S. citizen, do not agree.  I think he's just as sneaky, if not sneakier, than his opponent.  If he gets in and is able to live out the full 4 years of his first term, I'm certain that he will be unable to continue thereafter.  Then, he picks a woman for his running mate.  I have no problem there as far as a woman being in a high office.  What I have a problem with is the intent of McCain for choosing this woman.  Did he do so to try to make his own history by figuring if he is elected, he would have brought in the very first female VP?  Sure, we had Geraldine in the 80's, but we saw how far that campaign went, didn't we?  I cannot say I have anything against this Palin or whatever her name is because, until this announcement, I didn't know she even existed.  I will, however, do my research about her to better educate myself.  Maybe it would be the best for this country to elect McCain because of her - who knows?  I mean, the guy is old and could keel over any time and then this woman would be in charge and maybe that's what we need to get our stuff in order, here.  A woman who has not been on the "inside" and who will truly make a change to this country.

I have been beside myself since all of this started and can only say that I am so looking forward to this circus being over with in November.  I'm sick of hearing the lies, the put-downs of one another, and witnessing all of the expense of glitz being put into this shennanigans (money that could actually be donated for a way better cause in this country).  I don't care which celebrity backs which candidate, I don't care about making history, nor do I care what type of "party" they can throw.   And I certainly don't care to hear the dirty laundry of these people.  What I DO care about is a politician getting in who will actually follow through with their campaign promises and prove themselves to work FOR the American people and not for other countries, illegal immigrants, the oild industry, or terrorists.  I want someone who will truly keep the middle-class working people alive and not make them extinct - like it has been happening more and more.

So, for whom do I vote?  Pfft!  I can truly say I do not have an answer on that issue because they're both untrustworthy and sneaky and I really believe that no matter which party wins, this country will be in worse shape than it ever has been.

(For a glimpse at the image and full story, go to:)

http://hotair.com/archives/2008/08/19/inverted-opti
cs-dncc-wraps-obama-in-upside-down-flag/

Maybe the DNCC has kept track of the polling this summer and figures the Democratic nominee is officially in distress.  That’s the only explanation for a silly gaffe by the convention committee for the graphics on their credentials for those allowed to see Barack Obama’s acceptance speech at Invesco Field.  The holographic image uses an American flag motif with the blue field at the bottom, with Obama’s head emerging from it in one of the two alternating images (via the Weasel Zippers):

The viewers say with the stars and blue field in the lower left corner, it looks like an upside down American flag. Published flag etiquette states the stars should always be displayed in the upper left corner. An upside down flag represents an international symbol of extreme distress.

Matt Chandler with the Obama campaign says the flag is not upside down. He says it is a stylized flag designed to blend the stars on Senator Obama’s shirt with the flag blowing in the wind.

Yes — a flag blowing upside-down.  The DNCC would not even admit they used a flag:

“The DNCC community credentials incorporate patriotic design elements. They do not depict an actual American flag. The DNCC has full and complete respect for the flag and all rules of display.”

Take a look at the picture and see for yourself whether this depicts an American flag.  Blue field …. check. Stars …. check.  Alternating white and red stripes …. check.  Looks like the flag to me.  Maybe the DNCC isn’t familiar with Old Glory.

Flying a flag upside down is a distress signal.  Creating a graphic for a presidential campaign that includes an upside-down flag is a signal of a different kind — that the DNCC needs better management.

This was in someone's blog that I read and I just felt he had summed it all up with a few paragraphs.

Dear George Bush:

Pardon my etiquette when I don't address you as Mr. President, I don't really feel like being polite with you. At least I don't call you Dubya, so that's a plus, right?

I'm writing you to explain your role in your final months in office. You see, you're what they call a "lame duck," a term that may be lost on folks in this AFLAC age. However, much like the AFLAC duck, you're not funny anymore. We used to laugh at you; now, we grimmace. I've come to dread any news with you in it.

Whether shrugging off our massive post-2000 deficit, bulldozing through hypocrisy, or blatantly abusing your "executive priveleges," we the people have tired of your antics. And, seriously, we'd like you to just sit in a fat, padded recliner and do nothing until your term expires.

You can do whatever you'd like to do in your recliner: watch baseball, draw pictures of big "ka-booms," or take jello shots out of Dick Cheney's belly button. Just, please, don't "run" the country anymore.

We cut you a hell of a lot of slack with your fabrication and propaganda in the whole Iraq debacle. It's more of a Dick-Cheney's-Halliburton-stock-price-driver-upper, if you ask me. I wouldn't dare call it a war; but, then, you're the president, and I guess you can call it whatever you want to. It's yours, it ain't mine. Surprise! It is mine, I'm a taxpayer. But it isn't mine, for I have no executive privelege. [...] kind of catch-22 is this mess?!

We didn't choose to cut you slack during the oil price run-up, but what could we do? Your buddies at the local oil well are loving it, aren't they? Pushers, abusers, all of you. Much like reformed (or, reforming) druggies, we're going to make it through...bad news being, we won't make it through without ruining middle-class America. Whoops, did I say bad news? You're probably turning the other cheek to that news, so it must not exist.

And now? You're visiting the largest nation on Earth, praying in a state-run Christian church (regulated religion), and telling those folks of how their Communist country needs to be run. Like you have a shred of credibility left, George. Who are you to tell them what to do? Since when did America go from being the land of the free, to the land of the providers, to the land of the police, to the land of the revolution pushers? China is it's own country and can do what it wants. Really, we the people do not want a war with a billion human robots.

Nor do we want a war with Russia! The nerve! I feel for the people of Georgia; really, I do. But that's their deal, George, their deal. It's not that I don't have compassion or don't want to help, but I don't know those folks. I know plenty of people on this side of Earth that need help. They need clothes, they need food, they need jobs and shelter, and they're all from this country! Have you forgotten your own? You know, the people who live in counties with courthouses that kicked out Gore and Kerry ballots just so you could have the office?! Have you forgotten the country and the people and the welfare of such that you should be protecting?

We're wrecked, George. You and your supporting cast have managed to wreck this country.

But, like I said, we're going to make it through. Well, hopefully. You only have a few short months left in office, and all we ask is that you take a few long months of paid vacation. Seriously. Don't forget to pack your lap dogs, and leave the keys with someone, anyone but your cabinet.

That door is going to slam awful hard. Watch it on your way out.

Sincerely,
Skip

A president's pension currently is $191,300 per year.

Assuming the next president lives to age 80, Senator McCain would receive ZERO pension as he would reach 80 at the end of two terms as president.

Senator Obama would be retired for 26 years after two terms and would receive $4,973,800 in pension.

Therefore it would certainly make economic sense to elect McCain in November.

How's that for non partisan thinking???

by Patrick J. Buchanan  

Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America.? Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to. This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these:

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from  Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known. Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream.  

Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants.  

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.  

We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude??  

Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks.  
Let him go to Altoona ? And Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for 'deserving' white kids.? Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America ? Is it really white America 's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?  

Is that the fault of white America   or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?  

As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence. Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?  

Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?  

We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena . And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.  

 Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

Yep - another copy and paste from an e-mail, but I couldn't agree more!

Something I've often wondered about the way Ricky writes his blogs -  Why does every one of them have the "..." between each sentence?  Does this mean that Ricky does not know how to use proper punctuation, capitalization and grammar?  Seems to me that a college boy who loves to put down people by alleging they do not have a college education would at least show he's a bit more intelligent by structuring his sentences properly.

Hey Ricky - just being curious, here!

A little bit of humor in politics!

Several people noticed her sitting in her car with the windows rolled up and with her eyes closed, with both hands behind the back of her head.

I hope Mr. DiMora and his cronies all get what they deserve as devious, back-stabbing little bastards who are greedy and only are out for themselves while they continue to screw over Cuyahoga County.  it's about time we see some crooked politicians get nabbed for being so crooked and sneaky.

Enjoy prison, fellas!  Let's just hope your replacements aren't as demented as the lot of you!

Yep, PB and others, I'm copying and pasting a story that was e-mailed to me.  Read 'em and weep!  I think Americans need to know as much as possible before November.  To you others who are able to see the light, please read on.....

According to Snopes.com,   Princeton  was requested to put a 'restriction' on distribution  of any copies of the thesis of Michelle Obama (a/k/a/ Michelle laVaughn Robinson) saying  it could not be made available until November 5, 2008 but when it was published on a  political website they decided they would  lift the restriction.

                    http://www.snopes.com/poli
tics/obama/thesis.asp

Subj: Thesis - Michele Obama aka Michelle LaVaughn Robinson

OBAMA'S MILITANT RACISM REVEALED

In her senior thesis at Princeton , Michele Obama, the wife of Barack Obama stated that America was a nation founded on 'crime and hatred'. 

Moreover, she stated that whites in America were 'ineradicably racist'.   The 1985 thesis, titled 'Princeton-Educated Blacks and the Black Community' was written under her maiden name, Michelle LaVaughn Robinson.

Michelle Obama stated in her thesis that to 'Whites at Princeton , it often seems as if, to them, she will always be Black first...' However, it was reported

by a fellow black classmate, 'If those 'Whites at Princeton ' really saw Michelle as one who always would 'be Black first,' it seems that she gave them that impression'. 

Most alarming is Michele Obama's use of the terms 'separationist' and 'integrationist' when describing the views of black people.

Mrs. Obama clearly identifies herself with a 'separationist' view of race.  'By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desperation of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an

integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.'

Obama writes that the path she chose by attending Princeton would likely lead to her 'further integration and/or assimilation into a white cultural and social structure that will only allow me to remain on the periphery of society; never becoming a full

participant.' 

Michele Obama clearly has a chip on her shoulder. 

Not only does she see separate black and white societies in America , but  she elevates black over white in her world. 

Here is another passage that is uncomfortable and ominous in meaning:

'There was no doubt in my mind that as a member of the black community, I am obligated to this community and will utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit the black

community first and foremost.'

What is Michelle Obama planning to do with her future resources if she's first lady that will elevate black over white in America ?

The following passage appears to be a call to arms for affirmative action policies that could be the hallmark of an Obama administration.

'Predominately white universities like Princeton are socially and academically designed to cater to the needs of the white students comprising the bulk of

their enrollments.'

The conclusion of her thesis is alarming. 

Michelle Obama's poll of black alumni concludes that other black students at Princeton do not share her obsession with blackness.  But rather than

celebrate, she is horrified that black alumni identify with our common American culture more than they value the color of their skin.  'I hoped that these findings would help me conclude that despite the high degree of identification with whites as a result of the educational and occupational path that black Princeton alumni follow, the alumni would still maintain a certain level of identification with the black community.  However, these findings do not support this possibility.'

Is it no wonder that most black alumni ignored her racist questionnaire? 

Only 89 students responded out of 400 who were asked for input.

Michelle Obama does not look into a crowd of Obama supporters and see Americans. She sees black people and white people eternally conflicted

with one another.

The thesis provides a trove of Mrs. Obama's thoughts and world view seen through a race-based prism.  This is a very divisive view for a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in this country in a Barack Obama administration.

Michelle Obama's intellectually refined racism should give all Americans pause for deep concern.

Now maybe she's changed, but she sure sounds like someone with an axe to grind with America .  Will the press let Michelle get a free pass over her obviously racist comment about American whites?  I am sure that it will. 

PS: We (You & I) paid for her scholarship.

Read the terms below written by Fox8 for the blogging sites and other posts.  Please pay particular attention to Item #3.  Any person should KNOW that your postings of your garage, yard and other sales DO NOT belong on these blogs! 

You are welcome to post, transmit or submit messages and other materials (to bulletin boards, chat rooms, blogs or other public areas within this Site ("Forums"). In order to keep these Forums enjoyable and suitable for all our users, we ask you to follow the rules listed below. By participating in any of our Forums you are consenting to, and agreeing to abide by, these rules.

1. You agree that you are fully responsible for the content that you post. You agree to limit the content you post to the subject matter for which the Forums are intended. You will not post content that violates the copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights of any other person. You will not post content that is libelous, an invasion or privacy or publicity rights, defamatory, obscene, profane or indecent, abusive or threatening. You will not post content that constitutes a criminal offense, that gives rise to any civil liability or that otherwise violates any local, state, national or international law. You will indemnify Fox Interactive Media, Inc. (FIM), its parents and affiliates together with their respective employees, agents, directors, officers and shareholders, from and against any claims, liabilities, damages and expenses (including but not limited to reasonable attorneys' fees) related to or arising out of any content you have posted.

2. You understand and agree that FIM is not responsible for any content posted by you or any other third party. You further understand that FIM does not endorse and has no control over the content posted in the Forums by third parties, and cannot vouch for its accuracy or reliability. You also understand that FIM has no responsibility to monitor the Forums for inappropriate content posted by users. Even if FIM chooses, in its sole discretion, to monitor the Forums, we nonetheless assume no responsibility for the content of the postings. However, FIM reserves the right to prevent you from posting content to the Forums and to edit, restrict or remove your content for any reason at any time.

3. You agree not to post content that contains advertising, is for commercial purposes, or solicits a person to buy or sell products and services or to make donations.

4. You agree that any content you post becomes the property of FIM. You understand and agree that FIM and its parent and affiliated companies may use, publish, copy, sublicense, adapt, edit, distribute, publicly perform, display and delete the content you post as they see fit. This right will terminate at the time you remove such content from the Site. Notwithstanding the foregoing, a back-up or residual copy of the content posted by you to the Site may remain on the FIM servers after you have removed such content from the Site, and FIM retains the rights to those copies.

Okay, I've been trying to understand each candidate's "promises" for Presidency.  However, I'm really stumped on one issue and maybe you Obama supporters can enlighten me.  What change, exactly, is this man talking about?  I mean, what CHANGES does this man keep talking about which can benefit the U.S.?  So far, I see NO benefits and all I keep hearing is "Vote Obama for Change" but I never really hear from any of you as far as what CHANGES provoke your support!

Universal healthcare?  I don't see a change for the better!  I don't believe in it (sorry) and especially if I'm expected as a middle-class working citizen, to give others a free ride while I work so hard each day.

Raising taxes to send overseas?  How does that benefit us?  I mean, don't we have our own issues right here that need attention?

Education - I don't see anything he has said which will benefit our declining educational system.

What about gas?  A temporary cut?  Won't work!  The cut is only in the taxes, but these companies will continue to raise their prices to make up for it.  And, why is it temporary?  Why not do something permanent?

Going "Green" - well, that's all fine and dandy if the man can lower the cost to do so.  Right now, I think going green costs way too much and if he feels that it would better benefit this country, why wouldn't he do something to control the pricing?

These are just a few of my questions.  So far, the only "change" I see benefits either the ones who refuse to work, other countries, or the gas companies and research companies for what I see as a total gimmick!

I'd love to hear from some of you who fully support Obama in detail.  I mean, FULL detail as to WHY you feel he's the man for the office.  I'm tired of hearing "because he's about change."  Please elaborate!

The Jihad Candidate

by Rich Carroll

Conspiracy theories make for interesting novels when the storyline is not so absurd that it can grasp our attention.  'The Manchurian Candidate' and 'Seven Days in May' are examples of plausible chains of events that captures the reader's imagination at best-seller level.  'What if' has always been the solid grist of fiction.

Get yourself something cool to drink, find a relaxing position, but before you continue, visualize the television photos of two jet airliners smashing into the Twin Towers in lower Manhattan and remind yourself this cowardly act of Muslim terror was planned for eight years.

How long did it take Islam and their oil money to find a candidate for President of the United States ?  As long as it took them to place a Senator from Illinois and Minnesota ?  The same amount of time to create a large Muslim enclave in Detroit ?  The time it took them to build over 2,000 mosques in America ?  The same amount of time required to place radical wahabbist clerics in our military and prisons as 'chaplains'?

Find a candidate who can get away with lying about their father being a 'freedom fighter' when he was actually part of the most corrupt and violent government in Kenya 's history.  Find a candidate with close ties to The Nation of Islam and the violent Muslim overthrow in Africa , a candidate who is educated among white infidel Americans but hides his bitterness and anger behind a superficial toothy smile.  Find a candidate who changes his American name of Barry to the Muslim name of Barak Hussein Obama, and dares anyone to question his true ties under the banner of 'racism.'  Nurture this candidate in an atmosphere of anti-white American teaching and surround him with Islamic teachers.  Provide him with a bitter, racist, anti-white, anti-American wife, and supply him with Muslim middle east connections and Islamic monies.  Allow him to be clever enough to get away with his anti-white rhetoric and proclaim he will give $834 billion taxpayer dollars to the Muslim controlled United Nations for use in Africa .

Install your candidate in an atmosphere of deception because questioning him on any issue involving Africa or Islam would be seen as 'bigoted racism;' two words too powerful to allow the citizenry to be informed of facts.  Allow your candidate to employ several black racist Nation of Islam Louis Farrakhan followers as members of his Illinois Senatorial and campaign staffs.

Where is the bloodhound American 'free press' who doggedly overturned every stone in the Watergate case?  Where are our nation's reporters that have placed every Presidential candidate under the microscope of detailed scrutiny; the same press who pursue Bush's 'Skull and Bones' club or ran other candidates off with persistent detective and research work?  Why haven't 'newsmen' pursued the 65 blatant lies told by this candidate during the Presidential primaries?  Where are the stories about this candidate's cousin and the Muslim butchery in Africa ?  Since when did our national press corps become weak, timid, and silent?  Why haven't they regaled us with the long list of socialists and communists who have surrounded this 'out of nowhere' Democrat candidate or that his church re-printed the Hamas Manifesto in their bulletin, and that his 'close pastor friend and mentor' met with Middle East terrorist Moammar Gaddafi, (Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the Socialist People's Libyan Arab Jamahiriya)?  Why isn't the American press telling us this candidate is supported by every Muslim organization in the world?

As an ultimate slap in the face, be blatant in the fact your candidate has ZERO interest in traditional American values and has the most liberal voting record in U. S. Senate history.  Why has the American main stream media clammed-up on any negative reporting on Barak Hussein Obama?  Why will they print Hillary Rodham Clinton's name but never write his middle name?  Is it not his name?  Why, suddenly, is ANY information about this candidate not coming from main stream media, but from the blogosphere by citizens seeking facts and the truth?  Why isn't our media connecting the dots with Islam?  Why do they focus on 'those bad American soldiers' while Islam slaughters non Muslims daily in 44 countries around the globe?  Why does our media refer to Darfur as 'ethnic cleansing' instead of what it really is; Muslims killing non Muslims!  There is enough strange, anti-American activity surrounding Barak Hussein Obama to peek the curiosity of any reporter.  WHERE IS OUR INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA!?

A formal plan for targeting America was devised three years after the Iranian revolution in 1982.  The plan was summarized in a 1991 memorandum by Mohamed Akram, an operative of the global Muslim Brotherhood.  'The process of settlement' of Muslims in America , Akram explained, 'is a civilization jihad process.'  This means that members of the Brotherhood must understand that their work in 'America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions.'

There is terrorism we can see, smell and fear, but there is a new kind of terror invading the United States in the form of Sharia law and finance.  Condoning it is civilization suicide.  Middle East Muslims are coming to America in record numbers and building hate infidel mosques, buying our corporations, suing us for our traditions, but they and the whole subject of Islam is white noise leaving uninformed Americans about who and what is really peaceful.  Where is our investigative press?  Any criticism of Islam or their intentions, even though Islamic leaders state their intentions daily around the globe, brings-forth a volley of 'racist' from the left-wing Democrat crowd.

Lies and deception behind a master plan - the ingredients for 'The Manchurian Candidate' or the placement of an anti-American President in our nation's White House?  Is it mere coincidence that an anti-capitalist run for President at the same time Islamic sharia finance and law is trying to make advancing strides into the United States ?  Is it mere coincidence this same candidate wants to disarm our nuclear capability at a time when terrorist Muslim nations are expanding their nuclear weapons capability?  Is it mere coincidence this candidate wants to reduce our military at a time of global jihad from Muslim nations?

Change for America ?  What change?  To become another 'nation of Islam'?