MyFox
 

John_Schwada's Blog

by John_Schwada from Los Angeles

Last Post 15 days, 22 hours Ago


The latest Reuters-Zogby poll shows March has been a tough month for Barack Obama. Only three weeks ago, the Illinois senator seemed almost invincible as voters, superdelegates and the media rushed to jump on his bandwagon.

But now, according to Reuters-Zogby, his double-digit lead among Democrats over Hillary Clinton has been whittled away, the two now locked in a virtual statistical tie. (In February, after ten straight wins, Obama soared to a 14 point lead; in a poll taken earlier this week, his lead was down to 3 points – 47% to 44%).

Other pollsters that have been in the field in recent days (Gallup, with its tracking poll, and USA Today) also show the gap narrowing between the two Democrats (e.g., in the USA Today poll, Obama’s 12-point lead sank to 7 points in mid-March).

No question her convincing Texas and Ohio primary victories put some wind in Clinton’s sails, and now Obama’s struggle to explain how he squares his own perspective, philosophy etc. with that of his longtime pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, has put Obama on the hot seat.

The Wright-agony is probably far from over. Witness, for example, Obama’s answer to a question from Fox News Channel reporter Major Garrett about how he would have reacted if he had personally heard – while sitting in church – any of Wright’s controversial remarks (“God damn America,” etc.). Here’s an excerpt of that interview:

Garrett: So, quick yes or no. If had you heard them (Wright’s remarks) in person (Schwada’s emphasis) you would have quit?

Obama: If I had heard them repeated, I would have quit. I mean, obviously, understand that -- understand that, you know, this is somebody who is like an uncle. If you have -- to me. He's somebody who helped me find Christ. And somebody who always talked to me in very powerful ways about relationship to God and our obligations to the poor.

If somebody makes a mistake, then obviously, you recognize -- I make mistakes. We all make mistakes. If I thought that that was the repeated tenor of the church, then I wouldn't feel comfortable there.

But, frankly, that has not been my experience at Trinity United Church of Christ.

Yet, Tuesday, in his speech, Obama said: "Did I know him (Wright) to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes.”

If he heard them, then why didn't he quit as he told Fox News he would have done?

There appears to be a contradiction here. How significant is it if Obama didn’t exactly come clean with a reporter but told the whole truth in his speech – to voters everywhere? Hard to say. But it suggests – suggests – the potential credibility minefields out there regarding the Obama-Wright relationship.

What sermons, controversial remarks did Obama hear first-hand? Are there videos of Obama listening to Wright’s sermons – or other evidence of his attendance when the hot-potato ones were given? Did Obama challenge Wright about his views? Did he make statements disputing those views to other congregants? In other words, is Obama’s disagreement with Wright only a recent conversion, made for political purposes? Or was he okay with Wright’s views as long as they didn’t complicate his political ambitions?

Meantime, Clinton is trying mightily to keep Obama on the defensive.

With her opponent trying to regain his political sea-legs after the rocky-Reverend-Wright-ride, Clinton now is throwing a new punch: she bluntly challenged Obama Wednesday (March 19) to agree to primaries in Michigan and Florida, saying it would be “wrong and frankly un-American” not to let Democrats in those states have a voice in picking their party’s nominee. Are we surprised? Not at all.

Of course, keeping the spotlight on Obama’s troubles also keeps it off her own potential embarrassments, which many suspect may emerge from the release of the White House papers from the Clinton years and her income taxes…

In short, there will be a lot for voters in Pennsylvania to digest before their primary in late April, still weeks away. Hang on... the ride will be bumpy, sort of like Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride at Disneyland. Full of surprises, at times even hilarious.

7 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 7
Page 1 of 1
John_Schwada read my blog view my photos
Mar 19, 2008 | 3:07 PM

dain: i think your reaction is shared by a lot of voters. this wright affaire might be just the ammo clinton needs to convince super-delegates - even some who have gone over to the obama side in recent weeks - that her rival is unvetted, untested and that there's a danger he could explode in their faces if he's the nominee...who is apparently only now objecting that some of wright's views are obnoxious to him.

JimmyBobby
Mar 19, 2008 | 11:04 PM

In my opinion, Obama has completely erased, dealt with and set aside the question of his relationship with Rev. Wright. Any further parsing of it is just another distraction from the issues that matter. This is a perfect example of a media-driven controversy. John, I realize you can't single-handedly put it to rest, but as a member of the Fourth Estate I think you should do your part.

John_Schwada read my blog view my photos
Mar 20, 2008 | 7:56 AM

jim and jay: in a perfect world perhaps it would be wrong to parse every bit of the wright-obama relationship. but it isn't, and, as jim suggests, the driving force behind whether this stays on the front-burner or not is the media. unfortunately for obama, parsing these kinds of issues is what the media (and lawyers) do best. it's basic who, what, when, where, how - or to put it in the journalism vernacular of watergate: what did he know and when did he know it? it's easy for us to understand, get our arms around issues like this. and what's easy for us, is good for america!!! right?

John_Schwada read my blog view my photos
Mar 20, 2008 | 9:23 AM

jay - any more exclamation marks and capital letters and i'll have to put you in "blog jail."

John_Schwada read my blog view my photos
Mar 20, 2008 | 9:28 AM

by the way - check out the latest poll numbers from Gallup. The March 14-18 national survey of 1,209 Democratic and Democratic-leaning voters gave Clinton a 49 percent to 42 percent edge over Obama. since early february, the national gallup poll has shown the two in a statistical dead-heat. the latest numbers show clinton has opened up a statistically significant lead....

John_Schwada read my blog view my photos
Mar 20, 2008 | 9:44 AM

statueman: that muslim thing was not a screwup by me (i've had enough of my own and don't need to be saddled with someone else's). my "what's good for the media is good for america" remark was meant to be ironic, funny..only.

also want to congratulate you (intended to do it earlier) for having the forthrightness to identify yourself, for not wearing camouflage. don't get me wrong. i'm not saying the pandemic use of pseudonyms and noms de guerre on the web/blogs is "wrong." as a reporter, of course, i occasionally use anonymous sources, and they can help shed light on a situation. using blog/pseudonyms can facilitate a free-flowing dialogue, enabling the shy or people who fear that expressing themselves will have "real" repurcussions for them a chance to participate.

on the other hand, the use of pseudonyms may give people cover to say things that are....what? reckless? ugly? impolite (or impolitic?)? this discussion can get damned complicated, and i'm a mere reporter. getting back to my earlier observation, we reporters like it simple. our watchword is KISS (keep it simple, stupid). don't make it yours and you'll make us better for it.

JimmyBobby
Mar 21, 2008 | 2:17 PM

John, I wouldn't mind the parsing so much if it were complete. You see five hundred replays of "God Damn America" to every one, usually obscure, reminder that Wright was condemning very specific behavior, ones that have been committed by or in the name of America, unquestionably. "God Damn America for killing innocent people, God Damn America for treating its citizens like something less than human." Would Jesus himself have any argument with that? Listen to Wright's laundry list of reasons why America should look itself long and hard in the mirror:
“We took this country by terror away from the Sioux, the Apache, Arikara, the Comanche, the Arapaho, the Navajo. Terrorism.

“We took Africans away from their country to build our way of ease and kept them enslaved and living in fear. Terrorism.

“We bombed Grenada and killed innocent civilians, babies, non-military personnel.

“We bombed the black civilian community of Panama with stealth bombers and killed unarmed teenage and toddlers, pregnant mothers and hard working fathers.

“We bombed Qaddafi’s home, and killed his child. Blessed are they who bash your children’s head against the rock.

“We bombed Iraq. We killed unarmed civilians trying to make a living. We bombed a plant in Sudan to pay back for the attack on our embassy, killed hundreds of hard working people, mothers and fathers who left home to go that day not knowing that they’d never get back home.

“We bombed Hiroshima. We bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon and we never batted an eye.

“Kids

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




John_Schwada

As a reporter at Fox 11 News, I have covered national political conventions, presidential impeachment hearings and gubernatorial recall campaigns. I've done double-duty as an investigative reporter and, in this capacity, won Golden Mike and Emmy awards. I also have labored in the newspaper biz: LA Herald-Examiner, the LA Times, the San Diego Union, the Arizona Republic and the Riverside Press-Enterprise. I went to UC Berkeley and learned to respect the sharpshooting ability of Alameda County's "blue-meanies" who could hit protesters in the derriere with buckshot from 50 paces. I'm now looking for a wealthy benefactor who will donate their villa in Spain to me and my family.

Member Since: 7/4/2006