Last Post 234 days, 6 hours Ago
In an era of information over load, ACT Prep courses, AP courses, SAT Prep courses, TAKS, No child left behind, etc., the following article really has me puzzled.
With ALL of what today's youth has before them to make life easier, and to finish high school having been exposed to information we didn't receive until college- its unbelievable that kids today 17-19, are actually getting dumber. I know that's poor English, but it conveys the point.)
Last year's graduating class (2006) posted the lowest SAT scores in recent history, only to be surpassed by the class of 2007. How? Why? Back when Jesus and I were in High School, we didn't have ACT/SAT Prep courses, no AP courses, no guidance counselors, no internet, and little of what the kids today have. How can kids with access to all of what's available today, be worse off on average (academically) than those who didn't have it? Some will point to the lengthened test, or that more minorities are taking the tests. What many fail to realize is, a longer test actually increases your chance of passing, it doesn't decrease it.
Example: On a 20-question test, if you miss five, you will still make a 75.
On a 50-question test, if you miss five- you will earn a 90.
Therefore, a longer test is better.
Many minorities have access to similar preparatory material. You can buy ACT/SAT Prep software at Wal-Mart. Are we overexposed now, or have the Nintendo, X-Box, Playstation, and MySpace conspired to warp the value system of our kids?
What do you think, Dallas? Read on...
Source: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070828/ap_on_re_us/sat_
scores
By JUSTIN POPE, AP Education Writer 23 minutes ago
The class of 2007 averaged the lowest math and reading SAT scores since 1999, the College Board reported Tuesday.
Last spring's high school seniors scored on average 502, out of a possible 800 points, on the critical reading section of the country's most popular college entrance exam, down from 503 for the class of 2006. Math scores fell three points from 518 to 515.
The declines follow a seven-point drop last year for the first class to take a lengthened and redesigned SAT, which included higher-level math questions and eliminated analogies. The College Board, which owns the exam, insisted the new exam wasn't harder and attributed last year's drop to fewer students taking it a second time. Students typically fare about 30 points better when they take the exam again.
The College Board's report Tuesday noted that a record number of students — just short of 1.5 million — took the test. The cohort of test-takers also was the most diverse ever, with minority students accounting for 39 percent: There has been a persistent gap between the scores of whites and the two largest U.S. minority groups, Hispanics and blacks.
In New York, 89 percent of students took the exam, up from 88 percent last year. Maine recently became the first state to use the SAT to meet its Grade 11 assessment requirements under the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and 100 percent of students took the exam there, compared to about three-quarters in the class of 2006.
"They have taken a very progressive stand in trying to get more and more students to go to college," College Board President Gaston Caperton said of Maine at a news conference Tuesday morning. "The larger the population you get to take an examination, it obviously knocks down the scores."
The number of black students taking the SAT rose 6 percent, and the number of test-takers calling themselves "Other Hispanic, Latino or Latin American" (a group that does not include Puerto Ricans or Mexican Americans) rose more than 25 percent.
Average scores also slipped from 497 to 494 on the writing portion of the SAT, which debuted with the class of 2006. Many colleges are waiting to see results from the first few years of data on the writing exam before determining how to use it.
Figures released earlier this month on the rival ACT exam showed a slight increase — from 21.1 last year to 21.2, on a scale of 1 to 36 — for the class of 2007.
The SAT has historically been more popular on the East and West coasts, while the ACT has been more popular in the Midwest and inland western states. But more and more students are taking both exams to try to improve their college resumes.
---------------------------------------------
| Member Comments | Total Comments: 17 |
|
|
furbie
Aug 28, 2007 | 11:40 AM |
|||||
|
UCantHandleThisTruth
Aug 28, 2007 | 4:59 PM |
|||||
|
TexasGuyDFW
Aug 28, 2007 | 8:13 PM |
|||||
|
mckinney_mom_87
Aug 29, 2007 | 3:48 AM |
|||||
|
TexasGuyDFW
Aug 29, 2007 | 6:31 AM |
|||||
|
UCantHandleThisTruth
Aug 29, 2007 | 11:33 AM |
|||||
|
KellerKowboy
Aug 29, 2007 | 3:11 PM |
|||||
|
leegrimsley
Aug 29, 2007 | 10:43 PM |
|||||
|
UCantHandleThisTruth
Aug 30, 2007 | 9:32 AM |
|||||
|
Herschel
Aug 31, 2007 | 9:26 AM |
|||||
|
Herschel
Aug 31, 2007 | 9:26 AM |
|||||
|
UCantHandleThisTruth
Aug 31, 2007 | 10:17 AM |
|||||
|
Herschel
Aug 31, 2007 | 1:48 PM |
|||||
|
UCantHandleThisTruth
Sep 2, 2007 | 1:28 PM |
|||||
|
Herschel
Sep 4, 2007 | 9:22 AM |
|||||
|
UCantHandleThisTruth
Sep 4, 2007 | 5:24 PM |
|||||
|
stinkey
Feb 1, 2008 | 6:30 AM |
|||||
|
|||||
Dallas, (75287) by way of Waterproof, LA (71375). 10-year Army vet. 10 years in corporate America. Husband, Father, Son, Christian, Part-Time Comedian.
Member Since: 10/9/2006