EVOLUTION Blog

The following post appeared on  http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=25
&t=3692&m=1  where an ongoing debate (with polite company generally) is taking place regarding creation vs evolution. I hope you enjoy this.

RAISING STANDARDS

In order to preserve the finest standards in our American schools, culture, society, and methods, we can make efforts to discover relevance in what we choose to provide to the public.

Politics is on the forefront at this time, and most people consider how we as a nation are designed. We have three branches and the greatest debate goes on in the Legislative branch, between two parties. The other two branches elicit other emotions, contrary to debate: Executive and Judicial.

For the purpose of this proposed discussion topic, we can assume that the Legislative branch is the most powerful of the three branches. When we debate the manner in which we organize our lives, we attempt to provide a fairness in areas where there is no fairness. Providing for our loved ones, whether nation or family, is difficult due to many factors: loss of life, loss of income, loss of health, to name a few. When we are struggling to produce fairness, we design crutches or laws so that boundaries will bind up the total concern as a picture of peace and prosperity when in fact, a number of struggles threaten to undo the overall success of our endeavor.

One struggle which we have all undergone is that of educating ourselves. At first we rely upon our schools to provide for us, but soon learn that the ultimate weight of this effort is upon our own shoulders. We pick and choose in an effort to make use of the talents we have for the common good and for the most benefit.

I have undertaken this struggle and do not make an attempt at proving it an accomplishment, but rather make an attempt at proving there is need of revision.

I did not get welcomed at our universities with total enthusiasm for what I could discover in books. Instead I found certain books excluded from study, from mention, and from respect. Those books I did not understand and yet I was drawn to them. I spent nearly 5 years that could have been spent at university studies, becoming familiar with study material that was only embraced at The Theosophical Society. The material I read while a staff member at the National Headquarters of the Society and the lectures and gatherings I attended made up a core basis for applying myself towards a healthy lifestyle. However this work was not completed until approx. 20 years later, when the time had arrived for the investigation of the work of H.P. Blavatsky on Anthropogenesis in THE SECRET DOCTRINE. At that time, I had also engaged for over 10 years a seperate organization with new writings depicting a similar, but not conjoined, truth.

A sudden revelation brought the material I had been studying into perspective in such a way that I became compelled to voice the viewpoint which I had discerned due to certain impending dangers. I have hence departed from my path of a prescribed and healthy lifestyle into a life of danger, threat, and resistance.

My schools, while differing with me in their forthrightness, held to ideals that I treasured. Now with this struggle to be heard on my hands, they do not, because they do not open their doors to me.

From the "legislative" debate, I was thrust into the "judicial" punishments for lacks within myself for not being able to provide enough compelling drama to convince the society I live in to reexamine a book and author that was earlier (1888) dismissed. Blavatsky's work provides added dignity and fodder to those people who adhere to walking the fine line of truth (wherever they find it). See my webpage for details of her theory of evolution.

While I cannot avoid the hardship of raising my voice in this "judicial" atmosphere, I long for and turn my eyes toward the "executive" realm. If I could produce for you a system that incorporates all parties in this debate into a tightly wound tunnel of composite endeavor, we could end the debate by showing a way for all parties to be provided for equally. No member of a religion should have to face exclusion. No member of a science should have to face censorship. All parties could learn new ways to contribute to the sum total of our wealth - our knowledge.

I want to raise myself to the "executive" position of leadership in our country for one sole purpose: to make this theory of evolution heard. How can I do so without your aid? Will you vote for me?

The following post appeared on http://www.evcforum.net/cgi-bin/dm.cgi?action=msg&f=25
&t=3692&m=1 where an ongoing debate (with polite company generally) is taking place regarding creation vs evolution. I hope you enjoy this.

RAISING STANDARDS

In order to preserve the finest standards in our American schools, culture, society, and methods, we can make efforts to discover relevance in what we choose to provide to the public.

Politics is on the forefront at this time, and most people consider how we as a nation are designed. We have three branches and the greatest debate goes on in the Legislative branch, between two parties. The other two branches elicit other emotions, contrary to debate: Executive and Judicial.

For the purpose of this proposed discussion topic, we can assume that the Legislative branch is the most powerful of the three branches. When we debate the manner in which we organize our lives, we attempt to provide a fairness in areas where there is no fairness. Providing for our loved ones, whether nation or family, is difficult due to many factors: loss of life, loss of income, loss of health, to name a few. When we are struggling to produce fairness, we design crutches or laws so that boundaries will bind up the total concern as a picture of peace and prosperity when in fact, a number of struggles threaten to undo the overall success of our endeavor.

One struggle which we have all undergone is that of educating ourselves. At first we rely upon our schools to provide for us, but soon learn that the ultimate weight of this effort is upon our own shoulders. We pick and choose in an effort to make use of the talents we have for the common good and for the most benefit.

I have undertaken this struggle and do not make an attempt at proving it an accomplishment, but rather make an attempt at proving there is need of revision.

I did not get welcomed at our universities with total enthusiasm for what I could discover in books. Instead I found certain books excluded from study, from mention, and from respect. Those books I did not understand and yet I was drawn to them. I spent nearly 5 years that could have been spent at university studies, becoming familiar with study material that was only embraced at The Theosophical Society. The material I read while a staff member at the National Headquarters of the Society and the lectures and gatherings I attended made up a core basis for applying myself towards a healthy lifestyle. However this work was not completed until approx. 20 years later, when the time had arrived for the investigation of the work of H.P. Blavatsky on Anthropogenesis in THE SECRET DOCTRINE. At that time, I had also engaged for over 10 years a seperate organization with new writings depicting a similar, but not conjoined, truth.

A sudden revelation brought the material I had been studying into perspective in such a way that I became compelled to voice the viewpoint which I had discerned due to certain impending dangers. I have hence departed from my path of a prescribed and healthy lifestyle into a life of danger, threat, and resistance.

My schools, while differing with me in their forthrightness, held to ideals that I treasured. Now with this struggle to be heard on my hands, they do not, because they do not open their doors to me.

From the "legislative" debate, I was thrust into the "judicial" punishments for lacks within myself for not being able to provide enough compelling drama to convince the society I live in to reexamine a book and author that was earlier (1888) dismissed. Blavatsky's work provides added dignity and fodder to those people who adhere to walking the fine line of truth (wherever they find it). See my webpage for details of her theory of evolution.

While I cannot avoid the hardship of raising my voice in this "judicial" atmosphere, I long for and turn my eyes toward the "executive" realm. If I could produce for you a system that incorporates all parties in this debate into a tightly wound tunnel of composite endeavor, we could end the debate by showing a way for all parties to be provided for equally. No member of a religion should have to face exclusion. No member of a science should have to face censorship. All parties could learn new ways to contribute to the sum total of our wealth - our knowledge.

I want to raise myself to the "executive" position of leadership in our country for one sole purpose: to make this theory of evolution heard. How can I do so without your aid? Will you vote for me?

http://www.tri-cityherald.com/1190/story/171383.htm
l

This link will take you to a letter that was published (It seems that it was published although I haven't seen a hard copy of the paper.) in the Tri-City Herald written by me and responded to by Mr. Movie. I'm thrilled.

I tried to have a discussion with others who read the latest book by Barack Obama, however the "feds" skipped out on the discussion. (See previous blog post.) 

I've been thinking how people might react to the idea that here in the U.S. we have the training ground (and else in the Americas as well) for 6th race people and how unfortunate it is that they are on a continent that has a slightly different frame of reference.

And in reading about chapter headings, "politics, faith, and race" in the book, am trying to consider how some companies are taking their manufacturing elsewhere, into China for one and Mexico for another.

In considering how the U.S. can compete with global economy, I came up with an idea. We use our reference to the 6th race continent as a means to accomplish the training of people from around the world. If here in the U.S. we like teaching and we are good at it, rather than commit our time to factory work, we offer packages whereby people from around the world can come to the United States and learn our methods and powers of mind, how to speak to each other, how to approach working together in peace, etc.

Our country could become a training center for the world as a source of revenue and business.

Brenda

In looking for a place to discuss Barack Obama's book THE AUDACITY OF HOPE, I found a site called federalsoup.com and joined a discussion topic called, "Exploiting the 'Audacity' of Hope, Situation Ethics, Group Deception, Realities and. . . " under the Forum "Inside the News"

This is a reprint of a post by me on an msn group called Creation vs Evolution, topic: "If the Universe is only 6000 years old...." I'd actually like to see it on all the major news shows. I can just picture Steve Edwards at Good Day L.A., Fox 11, saying something like this:   "In light of recent evidence it appears that ordinary people should be preparing for a possibility that they might be someday in possession of extraordinary talents, according to researcher, Brenda Tucker. A brand new take on evolution indicates it is a higher kingdom of nature, which she terms 'girasas', that is capable of performing above the current level of human expectations. If girasas can be found occasionally altering a characteristically human world, it leaves the future generations with the task of placing key personalities into roles requiring contact and nourishing of the relationship between human and "higher kingdom." Understanding that among the needs of this kingdom is the need to present the human beings with potential growth areas for our investigation and choosing, including a way to transform from the earthly bodies we now occupy into a body that lasts beyond death (for our own safety and that a cycle of evolution may continue). This cycle depicts human beings descending through animals (which are in the process ascended out of material existence or into extinction) and ascending through girasas, after a lengthy period of interaction and investigation of key ingredients to growth. If this theory can be approved by science and religion alike, we may have the workings of the end of an era of Darwinism."

If you were to raise me and my theory of evolution above Darwin, what would result is that the world would become segmented and (from Ground Zero) we would have Ground One = Egypt, Ground Two = India, Ground Three = Greece, Ground Four = China and Asia, Ground Five = Russia and Europe, Ground Six = The Three Americas and Australia, Ground Seven = Israel and Africa.

Once this theory is understood, we would estimate that Ground Four will decrease in size and as time puts it into a minor stage and that Ground Five will be in a majority stage, however Ground Six will emerge with talents that no other peoples have yet witnessed and with that talent will come the responsibility to use it in directing the other brothers towards their future roles.

All of this would happen s l o w l y and not in one lifetime. As we ascend and leave the earth in approx. 16 million years, it is only written in the books that we will return to earth 3 more times, descending through the animals and ascending through the girasas. At the end of the 7th round earth will die, but more likely in the way that Venus is dying and now in her seventh round. Mercury is a dead planet, but Mars is in Pralaya or rest between her third and fourth rounds (right behind us) and as the planets advance the life on it transfers to a new laya center beginning with a 1st round (not very physical, more on the order of Neptune perhaps).

There is a whole story regarding the birth and death of stars and an old laya center would be somewhat of an artifact. We are told that the moon was the previous laya center of the earth and that life from the moon (now a dead remnant of a planet) somehow transferred to the earth.

When the life of the sun is over, I expect that its life will transfer too.

How not to appear too eager to go forward or too reluctant to continue on this chosen course or Why Work Isn’t Fun:

 

So in order to address the many issues that face a person engaged in girasas contact, I can contribute to many types of discussion opportunities.

 

1. Imagining myself with my own newspaper column (instead of borrowing your blogspace) and every day or every week, the newspaper wants to print this column with new and fresh ideas for readers to ponder. This week’s issue contains an answer to a reader’s question about people in his life who have changed in a way that has taken those people away from the reader’s circle of influence. The reader wrote to the feature writer that he can’t understand why his sister is so removed from his life and spends all of her time participating at the local church. Their relationship has changed to the point where it seems as if his sister no longer needs or wants his counsel and their contacts have grown few and far between – as if he has lost her to her church. The journalist might answer his question about what he should do to bring his sister back to him like this:

 

When people address their life issues by committing themselves to serious study of the Word in some form, they are given the directive that their life is either in the world or not in the world and that they cannot do both. I remember hearing this idea many times, that I could either participate in the ways of the Spirit or in the ways of the World but that I should not mix them. In order for your sister to focus all of her attention on the experience of knowing her inner self, it may appear to those around her, family and friends from before her commitment, that she has secluded herself away from them or that she has been brainwashed or become a victim of cult separatism.

 

This is actually a typical phenomena which has caused great distress to me in the past also, with the feeling that family and friends are lost to me. We become quite content with our separate lives, feeling we have made it to the best place that we can possibly attain to and that we would be satisfied simply engaging in our newly found activity till the end of life. We maneuver less effectively when this feeling exists, and until that feeling of loss abates we are discontent.

But something always seems to upset the balance and whether it is a new job or some other change in the situation, we only look back on the loss now and don’t carry it with us any longer.

 

What you might expect with the situation with your sister is that she has secluded herself from her past in order that she might engage in some investigation which is or will be an integral part of who she is. What happened with me is that I had a moment of awakening, an enlightenment of sorts, where the concepts that I was studying gelled into a new and foreign substance. Because the new theory of evolution involving the girasas kingdom was not present ‘IN THE WORLD,’ I began to have itchy feet, wanting to leave my safe haven of protection and begin life again in the world even though I don’t feel akin to people who haven’t had spiritual awakenings. It became my calling to tell others what I had found out while residing in the secret sanctuary, the inner sanctorum.

 

Your sister may one day come back to you fuller than she was before with more to offer you. Often others attempt to leave their lives away from those they loved when they become disillusioned with themselves or their surroundings and what used to look like utopia has turned into a detriment to their character and spirit lives rather than a blessing. When this happens, members who have had a great journey into their spirit lives, often return to their loved ones and families with a word to the wise about what to expect.

 

Participating with a group spiritually can be done on many levels and there are a great variety of participants to engage with you on your path. Making the statement that you have found a great nourishing community to family members is often not sufficient. If people are going to demand proof, then a block of time away from what used to be the typical routine, can be a way of providing proof.

 

Does this mean that the girasas becomes “supreme” in our life for a limited amount of time and then finishes their accomplishment by completing our evolution? Does this mean that we leave the girasas in that spiritual community when we vacate it? What actual work with the life of the person was performed during those months of total participation? If they change one and then go on to change another and another, do we live upon the energy that they succeeded in embedding into our being? Can we even meet the girasas in the ‘outside world’ or do they prefer to lock themselves away from unyielding influences?

 

Every day after having divorced myself from participation in the two major groups that had an effect on my life, I use and see those girasas around me. While I do not have a center of light established for seekers to generate their own forces, I dwell constantly in the ‘center’ that was provided to me by study. I regret that I have complied with the directive that we cannot participate in both the world and the way of the spirit. I sometimes still question whether or not it is true and real, but no one yanked me out of one and into the other. I went by my own free will.

 

I do not think we should attempt to expose children to the intensity of a spiritual life when they are in school because I think that children need to learn what choices there are in life and not commit to any one choice while they are learning. But I think it would be fine for children to learn what ideas exist and are calling to others for willing participation. Pros and cons can be tallied and examined within a school classroom and in this way, lines of communication are opened in the young so that no one needs to feel completely alone even when traveling down the less traveled road in life.

 

While it may seem as if you have lost your sister for a time, wait for her to stay the course. She may return to you whole and alive in a way you never knew her before. For myself, fear and dread of human failure prevailed. The desire to participate in the effort to categorize and investigate scientifically with a common good as the goal overtook the drive to manage my existence. If I had stayed separate and in the small group, even while enjoying the contact immensely, everything about me would have been a lie. I would have betrayed myself and the very idea of love.

 

2. Is there a right and a wrong way to approach local churches with the story that I

engage in telling others. Would I request a meeting to discuss my thinking with a group of church leaders? Would I ask to meet with the minister in his/her office? Could I accomplish the same thing by writing a short letter or emailing a link to my webpage rather than asking for personal meeting time? Is a mass mailing in the best interest of being a responsible community member?

 

Any thoughts on developing either of these two ideas?

 

 Vote before Florida Legislature

The Florida Legislature is hearing arguments on a new bill called the "academic freedom" legislation which, if passed, will allow intelligent design to be studied in the classroom. I wrote to Brandon Hensler, Director of Communications at Florida ACLU, and told him my story.

I expressed to him that I would have found the job of "releasing" my findings much simpler if I had been able to stay in school with my studies. I told him not only did I drop out of school and go elsewhere to pursue my goals, but now that I have findings, it is a long road to having them published. 

Newspaper contact

The SFGate, an online version of the San Francisco Chronicle published a reprint of an article called "'Frisco's frontier journalism" and I left a couple of comments inviting them to be cutting edge and print my work, saying how much it is both humorous, full of fight, and a little painful, much how they liked the news at one time.

Winner of Prize money

It's exciting news that the Templeton prize for religion has been awarded to Michael Heller, a Polish Catholic priest. I didn't know that the Templeton prize promises more money than for any Nobel in some sort of an effort to become "hottest ticket." Good luck to him.

 

 

My son is studying the Holocaust in his 8th grade English class. They are reading NIGHT by Elie Wisel and he insisted that I read the book too. After reading the book, he looked at me with askance eyes and I just said, "I already knew about this." He'd ask again what I thought of the book, and I'd say, "I already knew it." Perhaps he wanted to share the emotion that it brought to the surface in him and the shame and hurt and horror, but I didn't know how to address what happened other than the usual, "barbaric" and other such admonitions.

I looked for Elie Wiesel on the internet and found he won the Nobel Peace Prize, that he has a Foundation, and an essay contest on ethics. There is a Humanitarian Award as well and former recipients include Hillary Clinton, George Bush, Laura Bush, and the latest, Oprah Winfrey.

I dropped this organization a short line introducing myself and my work.

There is a website and a book called "This I Believe" and essays written by citizens are selected for reading and discussing on radio stations. The first book by this title was written in the 50s and so this is like a revival or reissue of that book.

I wrote an essay for the contest, but it was not chosen to be aired on radio stations. It is about betrayal and about how betrayal happens to all of us and not just occasionally to a few individuals.

KNOW THAT WHAT JESUS SAYS IS TRUE

I believe in Jesus Christ. I searched through world literature and found a theory of evolution not discussed in our schools. Instead, it is preserved since 1888 under the auspices of theosophy. This theory of evolution is presented best by the life of Jesus Christ.

If there was betrayal in His life, what makes you think there will not be betrayal in your life? Do you know that in Helena Blavatsky's book, THE SECRET DOCTRINE, published in 1888, a theory of evolution presents seven human races occurring over a period of 325 million years? Those seven races are not known about, discussed, presented in the schools, nor taught in any way within the general public. Only through association with mostly secretive, esoteric type groups can we study this approach to self-improvement that any theory of evolution should include.

If there is a descent of the human race(s), it occurs through animals that exist on the earth ahead of human beings. When you think of Jesus' teaching and "the kingdom of heaven," do you think that it is through contact, interaction, and exchange with the higher kingdom of nature, which I named girasas, that humans evolve? The higher kingdom's presence makes us only now 5th race humanity. If you look into the distant past, you won't find any record of this higher kingdom, because 1st through 3rd races were human-animal. If you study the life of Jesus Christ, you will best know what an effect girasas can have on the individual who presents themself for growth and change.

I have worked for over 12 years communicating the idea that I found in theosophy with minimal results. I have tried newspapers, councilmen, scientists, religious leaders, organizations, chat groups, presidents, and every possible way to have this story heard. It is not only frustrating to me, but it is also taxing on my children and those who know me to witness my failure at communicating this glorious future of man.

The only solace I have is in loving Jesus Christ. It was his life that communicated a great message. It was his ability to heal and work miracles and not only to teach, but to astound, that caused people to listen. While others teach what is found in THE SECRET DOCTRINE, they don’t teach it as if a girasas kingdom becomes part of the human body, mind, and life and that in the future, there will only be more incidence and occurrence of that happening.

Beliefs in everything else; whether patriotism, citizenship, hard-work, self-determination, community, education, and even love have all been damaged by the work I have been trying to do. Only one belief still stands strong in my life, for it is His life only that is an example to me of why we are the way we are. I only hope and pray that there has been enough death "on a cross" between human and girasas and that someday I will be heard publicly without death having to occur.

I read an article printed in The N.Y. Times by Carl Zimmer, called "In Games, An Insight Into the Rules of Evolution" http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/31/science/31prof.html?
ref=sciencespecial2  It is about a Harvard Professor by the name of Martin Nowak who establishes cooperation as the third essential ingredient for evolution to take place, alongside selection and mutation.

I sent to him, via his associates on the website for ETC (Evolution and Theology of Cooperation) http://www.fas.harvard.edu/~etc/ a letter linking to my website. I hope that in his upcoming lectures he might find room to discuss my findings as well as his own.

 

 

January has been a tough month in the real estate market. Many of the appraisers I know are looking for work to tide them over. I checked out two properties recently, a condo and a single family in the San Fernando Valley and the most recent sales in their areas are showing (for the condo) a drop of about $60,000 since purchase 1 year ago and (for the SFR) a drop of about $125,000 since purchase 6 months ago. The orders don't even materialize into inspections.

BACK TO EVOLUTION

I have been talking over on PBS discussions on a group called Bible Studies with CL. I wonder if the executives there even read their blogs.

Here's an evolutionary question for you?

Which group has the highest chance of survival? Would it be the Christians who have struggled with opposition since they first existed and have become a major force in the world? Or would it be the newcomers on the field - those groups that I studied with and learned from from the time I was 19 to the time I was drawn away from them into a quest to expose what was written there, a period of approx. 25 years?

It seems as if Christians have long struggled and have well grounded opposition to their methods - both other religions and some scientists who cannot make sense of what is written in the Bible.

Meanwhile the new age groups have had few battles and try to encompass all beliefs according to what is newly written in their literature. The biggest attack so far on the new age groups I would call anti-cult, but that has certainly dwindled and can barely make the news today.

According to scientific odds, which group has the greatest chance of survival?

According to individual abilities to judge people and reward some with the highest honors, would you place your ability to know who is more deserving upon those who have faced battles and won or those who have yet to fight serious battles but are up and coming contestants?

If you had to envision the future acceptance of a new theory of evolution, would you find the Christian church to be our greatest ally or would you find there to be a need to build our society with new focal points of activity such as the "study center" or "temple" according to new age literature?

Could the church orchestrate a victory with honor and dignity? Or would they prefer to categorize the newcomers as yet another of their opponents? Battles or debates mean losses and most of us want to side with the victors.

Could we compare this grief-stricken scene with the political climate where new parties are often born, but when issues which are represented by them become absorbed by the old parties, they die?

Or would you say that our laws protect the unique literature and that under no circumstances would the sales of the new literature ever fall under the protection of the Christian church?

Who would be more honored by you? Those who are battle-scarred and fatigued or those who are still fresh youth?

Since the writer's are on strike, perhaps some of the bloggers here could use their own ideas (in a time of need) to present the news desk with our versions of the news. Here is my idea of how the story could be presented:

A store clerk in West Hills has postulated a new kingdom of nature based upon religious writings which have occurred in the last 150 years. Her presentation of this new kingdom and accompanying new theory of evolution is lending steam to the creation-evolution debate in a way that the "intelligent design" theory fell short on accomplishing.

A drawback to her exposition of the theory is that her work casts a shadow over the current academic climate and community as being negligent in covering the available literature on such an important subject. Without ample effort and time spent analyzing and listing implications, we are at a loss as to how best to take a stand in the face of the new concepts. Both the religious community and the scientific community are in danger of rejecting the new theory based on lack of support, however if this one woman who has been working to be heard for over a decade could find resonant voices in the community at large where individuals side neither with religion or with science on the debate a new challenger to the sides in the debate could come into existence.

With such a mind wrenching event unfolding in our own country as well as elsewhere in the world, we ask people to think with fortitude and patience until the experts have time to advise upon a course of action. It appears that most copy regarding the teaching of evolution would need to be rewritten. Many of the existing authorities in this field as well as those holding religious leadership positions need time to come to terms with the new theory so as to work it into their current thinking or be in danger of rejection by the public at large. Jobs could be lost due to hard headed thinking at a time when finesse and careful calculations are most needed.

For experts to err in a time of crisis due to their past oversights or lack of endeavor to focus on relevant reading material is unforgiveable and only the strong will survive such an overthrow of current thought.