MyFox
 

Bob_Tarlau's Blog

by Bob_Tarlau from West Los Angeles

Last Post 7 days, 5 hours Ago


Last Friday, I wrote that North Carolina’s Tue May 6 election would likely be the decider of the Hillary Clinton vs. Barack Obama battle.  Part of my thinking was that Clinton has been so far ahead in the Pennsylvania polls that victory there would be seen as status quo, a confirmation that the race continues.   Yet according to a couple of indicators this week, perhaps we won’t get that far.

For one thing, the Clinton campaign is cash starved… with big bills in her “to be paid” basket.  Secondly, her once rock solid Pennsylvania lead is shrinking – fast.  The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey in PA has Clinton leading Obama by just five percentage points, 47% to 42%. For Clinton, that five-point edge is down from a 10-point lead just a week ago.  She enjoyed a 13-point margin in mid-March and a 15-point advantage in early March.

Rasmussen's statement on these findings says:  “Support for Clinton slipped from 52% early in March, to 51% in mid-month, 49% a week ago, and 47% today. During that same time frame, support for Obama has increased from 37% to 42%.”

Over the last two weeks, the news for Obama has gotten much brighter.  First, The nightmare presented by his former pastor is on the back burner (perhaps until the GOP revives in the fall), with polls showing his campaign hasn’t really been hurt by Rev. Wright’s disgusting remarks… or Obama’s failure to confront him while a member of Wright’s church.

Second, Obama has also picked up some key congressional endorsements… including one from Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey… and a second female senator, freshman Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota.   She had recently voiced concerns about the rancorous tone of the Democratic primary, and said she was now forced to choose because she found remaining uncommitted difficult.   In her words:  "Between Barack and a hard place, I chose Barack."   Klobuchar joins Missouri Sen. Claire McCaskill in backing Obama.

And there was an important Obama endorsement from one of the Democratic Party’s top foreign policy figures, Lee Hamilton, a former U.S. House member from Indiana, where an important primary vote occurs May 6.   Hamilton, who co-chaired the commission that investigated the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks and headed the House Committee on Foreign Affairs, said he was impressed by Obama's approach to national security and foreign policy.

Third, the Obama campaign is flush with cash… and is already spending a good chunk of that to run TV ads in the remaining states.   Figures out yesterday (Thursday), show that that the Illinois Senator raised more than $40 million in March.  Clinton raised half that.

Now let’s say that Obama really is able to pull off an upset in the Keystone State.  I believe a Clinton loss in Pennsylvania would effectively end the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination.  Obama would certainly pick up the momentum to win most if not all of the remaining states – including that all-important North Carolina contest.

If it turns out to be Barack Obama vs. John McCain in the November election… Obama will face a tough sell job to bring over Hillary’s loyal base.  Rasmussen finds just 56% of Clinton’s current supporters say they are likely to vote for Obama against John McCain. Forty percent of Clinton voters in Pennsylvania say they are not likely to vote for Obama.

Just 21% of Pennsylvania’s Primary Voters say that Clinton should drop out of the race while 18% would like Obama to leave. Those figures are similar to results from a recent national survey. Fifty-one percent (51%) in Pennsylvania say it’s very likely the contest will not be resolved until the convention in Denver. That figure includes 61% of Clinton voters and 38% of those who support Obama. Overall, another 33% say a convention decision is Somewhat Likely.

Clinton – out on the Pennsylvania – campaign trail this week says she has something in common with legendary film boxer Rocky Balboa -- she's not a quitter.  Recalling a famous scene on the steps of the Philadelphia Museum of Art from the 1976 Oscar-winning film "Rocky," Clinton said that ending her presidential campaign now would be as if "Rocky Balboa had gotten halfway up those art museum steps and said, 'Well, I guess that's about far enough.  Let me tell you something, when it comes to finishing a fight, Rocky and I have a lot in common. I never quit. I never give up.”

The day she does quit – if it comes to that – will be a tough one for both her and the former president.  I wonder what she does then, endorse Obama?  At this point that’s hard to imagine but there have been stranger political bedfellows.

So if those 33% who say a brokered convention in late August is Somewhat Likely are actually right, how much damage does a floor fight do to the Democrats in the fall campaign?   I think not much.   For one thing, if the battle actually continued that far (and I don’t believe it will) the convention news coverage would be unbelievably heavy… surging right over the Republican Convention (or coronation) which comes the very next week.  McCain could find himself facing a case of damaged momentum.

OK, so I’ve posed some questions—and given you my take.  Now it’s time for yours.

Have a good week ahead… and I’ll be back here with THIS POLITICAL WEEK next Friday.

Cheers, Bob

14 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 14
Page 1 of 1
sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 4, 2008 | 2:40 PM

C'mon man. Do you really believe these polls? Sorry but I don't. Polls can be fixed and are often slanted. There are no more honest polls in this country and to be very honest there is almost no more country. The Feds, State and City governments have just about pissed America down the toilet. Too bad it isn't all of them getting flushed. As far as the Clinton's go, don't count em out yet. The Clinton's are like a dual set of big bad twisters. They blow in strong, leave devastation in their wake and you know what happens to old twisters...they end up in trailer parks!

You really want to hear what is happening in the world, goto youtube and search for "The Daily Savage" and you will hear the raw truth.

American Author, Poet, Songwriter and Filmwriter
"Mark Paul" Sebar
The Power To Write The Best!

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 4, 2008 | 5:32 PM

Memo From Mexico, By Allan Wall
Mexicans Spurn McCain’s Pandering—Prefer Hillary (But They’ll Settle For Obama)
Who do Mexicans want as the next U.S. president?

All three major candidates (John McCain, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama) have appalling records on immigration (see here) which must make Mexico’s elite happy. All three have pandered to Hispanics—by, among other things, appearing in the Spanish-language Univision debates. And any of the three can be expected to push for an amnesty.

Nevertheless, of the three, John McCain has pandered more, and longer, and has proven again and again his contempt for US immigration laws. McCain defended the illegal alien marches of 2006. He opposed English Only laws and efforts to assimilate immigrants generally. He also seems fonder of Hispanic culture than traditional American culture: in one speech, he said the U.S. is better off not having a common culture, while in another, to Hispanic congressmen, he said that the Hispanic blood and culture was a "noble cause" that enriched the country. McCains’s Hispanic outreach director, Juan Hernandez, a longtime amnesty agitator, is actually a U.S.-Mexican citizen and a former Mexican cabinet minister!

So by any objective standard, McCain has pandered more to Mexico and Hispanics than either Hillary or Obama.

Then McCain must be very popular in Mexico, right?

Maybe he should be—but he’s not.

A recent poll reported March 21 by El Universal, Mexico’s paper of record, asked which of the three candidates—John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama—would be better f

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 4, 2008 | 5:34 PM

A recent poll reported March 21 by El Universal, Mexico’s paper of record, asked which of the three candidates—John McCain, Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama—would be better for Mexico.

The results: Hillary Clinton got 41% of the Mexican vote. Obama was in second place, with 27% of the vote.

And John McCain? He got a whopping 8% of the vote!

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 10:59 AM

Where's the fence?? The Save Act?

El Paso Results Differ from CSM
A survey of the Border Patrol El Paso Sector showed little progress in building a fence along the U.S. Mexico border. According to American Border Patrol fewer than seven miles of new pedestrian fencing has been completed in the sector since November, 2006.
ABP challenges the report by the Christian Science Monitor that 27 miles of pedestrian fence are in place in the El Paso Sector, saying the true figure is 19.35 miles, including 13 miles of chain link fence that has been in place for more than ten years.

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 11:13 AM

Why hasn't The Save Act been voted on in Congress yet? Who is NOT for Border Security and Workplace Enforcement of our immigration laws.....no strings attached??? Tell your REPS to sign the discharge in Congress....ahora!!!

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 12:14 PM

Environmental lobbies abhor all by-products of human existence, unless generated by illegal aliens. In that case, the vast latrine and landfill created along the border with Mexico, as millions of illegals defecate and despoil their way to their destinations in the U.S., are just dandy.

To interfere with the natural formation of this outsized outhouse is to "jeopardize the quality of life and beauty of South Texas." Or so implied the president of the National Audubon Society. He was protesting the decision, late in the day, of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff to "expeditiously install additional physical barriers and roads at the border to deter illegal activity."

Chertoff, a Bush boy – and therefore a Johnny-come-lately to the idea of a border – has been under pressure from a few of the barrier's congressional backers. They worry that environmental restrictions would postpone construction indefinitely. Quick on the trigger, the Sierra Club bleated that the Bush administration was threatening "endangered species and fragile ecosystems along the Rio Grande."

That the human inhabitants along the border are the worse for wear has never mattered much. Drug-trade related turf wars between gangs, brazen assaults on border patrolmen by invaders (often aided by American officials) and kidnappings – these are considered eco-friendly.

Bob_Tarlau read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 3:05 PM

Well hi there DfDeportation -- Thanks for all the comments although it seems like you are having a conversation with yourself. By the way, in one comment you deride polls and in the next you cite one (candidate popularity in Mexico). Hope others join the conversation. Bob

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 4:22 PM

Yeah, I know. Nobody seems to be interested in anything on the political scene. I'll keep tryin' if you will...

DfDeportation read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 8:01 PM

Uhhhh, no Bob. I didn't deride any polls...

Bob_Tarlau read my blog view my photos
Apr 5, 2008 | 10:16 PM

Your are correct... Sebar did that. Glad you clarified... and pleased you are both leaving comments. Cheers, Bob

statueman read my blog view my photos
Apr 7, 2008 | 7:30 AM

My poetic impression of the situation is that the April 22nd primaries will signal the end of the rich media real estate that is the democratic primary. In my election rap I see a "dropping out of the race to save face" in the revelations of a "Hillary Knew" styled conspiracy expose.

I make these poetic impression predictions because the media eats this stuff up and if I'm right I might just get my 15 minutes of fame at which point I will ask why the news media plays the prophet...

sebar read my blog view my photos
Apr 7, 2008 | 4:15 PM

Yes Mr. T, Sebar did deride it, because the pollsters, many (but not all of them) seem to be tilting their polls to influence the election much like many news people do these days, so the polls in general (a great majority) are disingenuous. Damned the news or truth, lets just throw elections and laws - that is what many polls and news people are all about. Many need to go back to journalism 101 and start reporting the truth and stop acting like political puppets. So like myself, many Americans generally do not trust either pollsters or especially the credibility of news people. Perhaps you and many at FOX are different, but there is so much mis-truths and pundit slants to news that news is now nothing more then propaganda for any political or foreign special interest. Hope this clarifies the truth a bit more.

American Author, Poet, Songwriter and Filmwriter
"Mark Paul" Sebar
The Power To Write The Best!

statueman read my blog view my photos
Apr 7, 2008 | 4:36 PM

Yeah... what Sebar said... maybe we the people should elect ourselves a new news media and buy it from the Corperations and do a public news media hostile take over.

After all a house divided and all that

A news media of the people by the people and and for the people

See cause I know... it's written in the Constitution..."We hold this news to be self evident."

beepbeep read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 4:40 PM

I'm totally against anything Republican. The bank bailout is a perfect example of Reagan trickle down economics.

The banks get bailed out and the people get $600 from the irs.

Should be enough to upset anyone. Unless you make a ton of money, it's totally against your economic interests to vote Republican.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




Bob_Tarlau

I'm a senior producer with KTTV Fox 11 -- doing investigative and feature pieces for the 10P news and half hour documentaries on subjects light to heavy. I've been in the TV news biz as a producer for over 40 years.

Member Since: 7/20/2006