MyFox
 

AGodthing's Blog

by AGodthing from NortWest Tarrant County

Last Post 59 days, 23 hours Ago


The U.S. Constitution and everything that it says about “separation of church and state”

 

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

 

THAT’S IT. FIN. NOTHING MORE.

 

The rub: Two camps of thinking on this say:

 

(1) Making no law RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT means the government cannot ALLOW ANY RELIGION. Those who subscribe to this school are faced with constantly fighting Christians, simply because we are a nation founded by Christians and today is still mostly Christian or at least those who CONSIDER themselves Christian. Christ established witnessing and leading people to him, and expects Christians to “recruit”. Many religions have no formal “recruiting” because there is simply no free will. (You are born, therefore you are Muslim.)

 

(2) Making no law RESPECTING AN ESTABLISHMENT means not respecting ONE RELIGION OVER ANOTHER. This seems to fit with the rest of the constitution and the preamble. People who claim this thought may find themselves, as Christians, constantly on the wrong end of the stick. Like so many things we approach these days, we take the shortcut by simply overcompensating. (If we persecute Christians and leave everyone else alone, we automatically erase any wrongs we have committed to any other religion. This will make us truly homogenous.)

 

And then there’s that next part: “Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

 

That means “Or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”. I don’t think we are quite as free in that area as those Masons and Quakers who wrote that.

 

Let the onslaught begin.

 

17 Comments |  Add a Comment

Member Comments Total Comments: 17
Page 1 of 1
chardoney read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 12:38 PM

You do realize, that phrase is NOT IN the Constitution, right?
What is there is that: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, OR PROHIBITING the free exercise thereof…"
Our founders came from GB and the oppressive rules and taxes of the catholic church... they wanted no part of that, hence, the Jefferson's letter. What is intended is that government STAY out of the churches business and NO religion would be a mandatory 'state' religion. It is often misconstrued by the ill-informed to mean,there shall be NO religion (Christian) IN government, which is of course wrong. Our entire system is based on the Judeo - Christian values and principals.

chardoney read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 12:39 PM

Oh yes, and the reason the Mormon's HAD to rescind from multi-wives idea years ago, was a Supreme Court ruling, stating they were free to worship/express their religion as long as it was not contrary to the laws of Jesus Christ.

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 8, 2008 | 1:15 PM

Chardoney,

If you are referring to the 1878 Reynolds Supreme Court ruling, there is no mention of the laws of Jesus Christ...is there another Supreme court ruling about this?

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 1:20 PM

My friend, the ultra-liberals have chased God out of the classroom and the courtroom. Now that societal ills have mounted, they clamor for more government programs to subsidize the populace. People need Jesus, not a handout. Even the Christ said it best, "The poor you will always have with you." We need more Jesus and less judges who advocate and promote their views.

anonymousthinker
Apr 8, 2008 | 7:22 PM

Interesting, Maybe taking God out of the classroom and courtroom is a good thing. If we let our prejudices get in the way of truth and justice then we are no better than the taxation of the church in GB. But keep in mind also that not ALL of the colonists or Americans today are Christians and should not be subjected to judgment based on beliefs that are not their own. Perhaps we should take a more open minded view and take into consideration that your Jesus quotes don't mean anything to a great many people. Stop trying to save the world and save yourself.

scottythecomic read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 7:32 PM

That cuts both ways, thinker. Truth is, more liberal, anti-God legislation is passed daily than you can shake a stick at. In the same manner you don't want God crammed down your throat (and I can respect that), I in turn don't want heathenism and immorality shoved in my face.

Finally, while I completely understand that Jesus doesn't mean a hill of beans to the majority of the world, He will in due time.

AGodthing read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 7:36 PM

Thanks, guys, for your comments and lively discussion. I knew, anonymous, that at least some of the onslaught I referred to would come. By the way, I didn't quote Jesus; only the constitution.

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 8, 2008 | 7:45 PM

Thank you, Thinker. I have always marveled at how people think we were founded as a Christian nation. Quite the opposite actually. And the author of the phrase, "separation of church and state" was Thomas Jefferson, himself a deist, NOT a Christian. Also, I understand how Christians are persecuted in China and other such countries, but that seems like a bit of a overstatement for this country. Where is the actual persecution of the Christians here? We're in the majority.

AGodthing read my blog view my photos
Apr 8, 2008 | 8:32 PM

DMoriarty: Two things you need to read: The U.S. Constitution and the comments above. There IS NO phrase as part of our nation’s legal structure that says "separation of Church and State". About persecution of Christians here: Compared to many religions, Christians do endure some prejudice in our schools, at work and in our courts. HOWEVER, you are correct in your comparison of the U.S. and China--today. We have yet to see that degree of persecution, but I can guarantee that it is coming. That is a concern of mine, because there are so many Christians that say "Oh, not in the great U.S.A!" Oh yes, look around and compare Christian freedoms 30 years ago to today. I have read the book and I am ready for whatever anyone is ready to throw at me. To live is Christ, to die gain.

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 8, 2008 | 10:04 PM

AGodthing:

Thank you for your comments, and know that we share a common faith and belief in Christ. I also know that the acutal separation is not in any official documents (I was a poliitcal science minor in college) I just wanted to point out the spiritual background of the man who coined the phrase you used in your opening statement. How can you guarantee that a Chinese level of persecution is coming in this country? And, yes, Christians do endure a bit more prejudice now than 30 years ago, but this is a much different country than it was 30 years ago, demo wise. Things must change with the times. You want to talk about persecution, let's talk about the peace loving main line Muslims who were attacked and derided after 9/11 because of a minority of nut jobs in their religion. There are plenty of nut jobs in our religion as well, and I understand how folks around the world can lump me in with borderline leaders like Pat Robertson and John Hagee, but I hope that they can see the difference between them and what I see as legitimate Christians like me just like I can see the difference between the terrorists and the majority of Muslims. Ghandi had a great quote once..."I love your Jesus Christ, but I don't like your Christians, they are nothing like your Jesus Christ."

AGodthing read my blog view my photos
Apr 9, 2008 | 7:18 AM

DMoriarty: I am glad to hear that we have Christ in common. Just as the pre-trib, mid-trib and post-trib folks can agree to disagree, we can as well. On the "Chinese level of persecution": As I said--why not? I don't see anywhere in Isaiah or Revelation where it says "except the United States". There are few in this country who will survive "Chinese-type persecution", because they are simply not ready. Then where does that leave the great and mighty U.S?
On changing times: Yes, that's called prophecy being fulfilled. There again, Christians here are so numb they say that about everything. I wonder if, when accepting the mark of the beast, they say and will say, "Oh, that's just changing times." The Antichrist will have it easy here under those pretenses.
On the Muslim religion: I would advise you to read up. While I do not, of course, condone vigilantism, I do know enough about the Quran to know you don't have to be a "nut job" to kill Christians. When asking a Muslim about this, they will answer you honestly or change the subject. If they answer you honestly, it will make you a bit uncomfortable.
Everything else: Here, here. Agreed.

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 9, 2008 | 7:58 AM

I love people who can agree to disagree. Thanks, that's refreshing. We also disagree on the subject of "end times" No need to get into the details...we just don't see it the same way.
The only Muslims I know (one very well) have expressed outrage over the radical side that is emerging. I have read many parts of the Quran, and you can take things out of context, just like you can the Bible, to justify extreme actions, including murder. All holy books need to be read with the understanding of the whole, not just pick and choose parts without the broader historical, and figurative contexts.
Buuuuuut, back to the original subject of your post. It seems that there no longer a middle in this country, only extremes. It's either all or nothing, instead of compromise. There is no reason to ban Christmas or anything like that. If you're not Christian, then it shouldn't affect you that there is a Nativity downtown. But, I do agree with the removal of prayer from school. The way I understand prayer, there is no human force that can remove it from school anyway. If my kids want to pray in school, they can, anytime they want. They just shouldn't be required to, and the non Christian children sure shouldn't. So, no need to have a complete removal, no need to have a complete saturation. Reasonable discourse and compromise can be achieved. This is a grey area, the establishment clause of the constitution...there is no black and white.

AGodthing read my blog view my photos
Apr 9, 2008 | 9:15 AM

And with that they said "agreed". I especially like what you said about prayer. Nope, 'can't stop it. No way. I have always prayed, my children have always prayed and my grandchildren pray anywhere and anytime they want. I have to say that there have been some attempts at stopping us, like the first time my youngest daughter prayed for a friend on the playground after being hurt. Prayer is the most powerful tool Christians have on Earth. Too bad more of us don't take advantage of it.

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 9, 2008 | 1:15 PM

Amen....

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 9, 2008 | 6:04 PM

These are some excerpts from an article recently written by Alan Dershowitz on a blog.

The United States Constitution was called “the godless constitution,” by its opponents, because it was the first constitution in history not to include references to God or some dominant religion. The Constitution mentions religion only once, in prohibiting any religious test for holding office under the United States.
The Bill of Rights mentions religion twice, once in prohibiting an establishment of religion (a clear reference to any branch of Protestant Christianity, which was then the dominant religion) and a second time, in guaranteeing the free exercise of all religions. Several years after the ratification, the Senate ratified a treaty with the Barbary regime of Tripoli which expressly proclaimed that “the Government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion.” In fact, many of our Founding Fathers, including the author of the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, were not Christians but rather were deists. In other words, they believed in the existence of God, but not in the divinity of Jesus or the divine authorship of the bible. Today they might be called Unitarians; in fact, John Adams, another author of the Declaration, and the President under whom the treaty was ratified, is buried in a Unitarian church, along with his wife Abigail and his son John Quincy.
Roger Williams–the religious leader most responsible for separating church and state in America–put it very well a century earlier: “no civil state or country can be truly call

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 9, 2008 | 6:05 PM

ed Christian, although the Christians be in it.” That is what is so striking about American history, namely, that a nation of Christians ratified a Constitution that did not in any way establish “the United States as a Christian nation.” We are in fact the most diverse nation in the history of the world and that is the secret of our success.

DMoriarty read my blog
Apr 19, 2008 | 11:44 PM

Any thoughts on the belief that the "end times" discussed in Revelations already occured in the 1st century? That Nero was the Antichrist, and that the widespread persecution of the Christians was by the Romans, etc. etc. etc. Just curious what people think of this? Makes sense to me.

Page 1 of 1


Write your comment below:




AGodthing

I'm about as involved as one can be in my community. I live suburban life through the families I minister to.I endured 27 years as a broadcaster, and in that time I learned to appreciate the power one can have in the newsroom. I have also seen that power abused. ...So I blog!

Member Since: 2/13/2008